Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Performance evaluation of optimal real-time polymerase chain reaction achieved with reduced voltage

  • 1, 3,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2, 3 and
  • 2, 3Email author
BioMedical Engineering OnLine201817 (Suppl 2) :156

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0579-0

  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used in nucleic acid tests of infectious diseases in point-of-care testing. Previous studies have demonstrated real-time PCR that uses a micro-PCR chip made of packing tape, double-sided tape, and a plastic cover with polycarbonate or polypropylene on a black matte printed circuit board substrate. Despite the success of DNA amplification and fluorescence detection using an early version of the micro-PCR chip, reaching the target temperature was fairly slow and, as a result, the total running time was getting longer. To reduce this runtime, the micro-PCR chip was modified by reducing the heater pattern size of the PCB substrate to one-quarter of the original size or less, while maintaining the ability of the heating pattern to cover the reservoir area of the microfluidic channel. In subsequent experiments, DNA amplification failed several times. During the analysis of the cause of this failure, it was found that the reagent was boiling with the heating range from 25 to 95 °C.

Methods

As a method of DNA amplification verification, images were captured by digital single-lens reflex camera to detect FAM fluorescence using diagonal illumination from a blue LED light source. The images were automatically captured at 72 °C (the extension step in nucleic acid amplification) and the brightness of the captured images was analyzed to con-firm the success of DNA amplification.

Results

Compared to the previous chip with a larger heating pattern size, the current chip appears to generate excess energy as the size of the heating pattern was reduced. To reduce this excess energy, the initial voltage was lowered to 2 V and 2.5 V, which is equivalent to a one-fifth and one-quarter voltage–power reduction in pulse width modulation control, respectively. In both voltage reduction cases, the DNA amplification was successful.

Conclusions

DNA amplification tests may fail due to the excess energy generated by reducing the heater pattern size of the PCB substrate. However, the tests succeeded when the voltage was reduced to 2 V or 2.5 V. The 2.5 V power test was more efficient for reducing the overall running time.

Background

Various inexpensive, disposable lab-on-a-chip systems (LOCs) are being developed for the purposes of miniaturizing, integrating, and automating point-of-care diagnoses using routine biochemical processes [13]. LOCs are used for various purposes in biotechnology, medical treatment and diagnosis, and basic research [4, 5]. The most urgent issues to address with the use of LOCs are ensuring that the fluid of cells and the aqueous solution of biomolecules are processed stably and inexpensively, and maintaining a favorable process for smaller sample sizes [1, 2, 6, 7]. Because of these requirements, microfluidic channels have been actively developed to process small sample amounts; generally, these channels are integrated through the expensive and difficult processes of etching, baking, and bonding the silicon, polymer, and glass materials [1, 2]. The use of tape, which is a thinner and flexible substitute for a microfluidic channel, allows for more efficient and less expensive channel fabrication [2, 8].

The market for LOCs is expanding greatly. Because mass-produced tapes are available at various thicknesses and they are low cost [2], the thermal cycling required for DNA amplification can be effectively conducted by selecting a thin tape to lower the thermal resistance. Furthermore, because the microfluidic channel is created by simply carving out the tape, fabrication is convenient.

In a previous study, a micro-PCR chip fabricated with double-sided tape produced results similar to those of conventional PCRs [9]. It was also confirmed that real-time PCR could be implemented using the micro-PCR chip based on a black PCB, as suggested in previous studies [10, 11]. Although the heating pattern circuit, which acts as a heater, is sufficiently wide to involve the microfluidic channel, the DNA amplification is successful. This is because the resistance of the heating pattern is high, and it takes time to attain the target temperature using heating and cooling processes.

In order to reduce the time needed to reach the target temperature, we performed PCR by reducing the area of the heater pattern to one-quarter or less of the conventional area. We then compared the results to previous experiments that used a large heating pattern. By reducing the size of the heater pattern, we predicted that the decrease in time to reach the target temperature would have no effect on DNA amplification. However, the amplification of DNA in the real-time PCR test failed. While investigating this amplification failure, we repeated the experiment while the PID control algorithm was being adjusted and found that the reagent in the chip was boiling in the section where the temperature was 95 °C above the initial target temperature. Compared to the previous chip with the larger area heating pattern, it appears that excess energy is generated as the size of the heating pattern is reduced. To reduce this excess energy, we lowered the initial voltage (5 V) to 2 V or 2.5 V, which is equivalent to reducing the PWM control by 20% or 25%, respectively. In both cases, the DNA amplification was successful. However, the latter case is more efficient since it reduces the overall running time.

In this work, we conducted fluorescence detection using the micro-PCR chip. This included reducing the heater pattern area and applying the voltage appropriate for the optimal conditions of real-time PCR considering the reduced resistance of the heater pattern. The PCR performance shown was necessary for PWM control with different sizes of the heater pattern.

The organization of this paper is as follows. “Methods” section discusses the micro-PCR driving system and micro-PCR chip structure. This is followed by “Results and discussion” section presenting the results of real-time PCR at different voltages and, finally, “Conclusion” section.

Methods

Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the proposed control system. The control system can be divided into a local system and the PCR chip. This paper focuses on the PCR chip component. The thermistor resistance of the PCR chip, originating from the voltage divider and ADC, is reported as a digital temperature value. A USB 2.0 port connects the local system to a PC. Every 50 ms, the temperature is recorded in the local system and the data values are sent to the host. At the host, the temperature values are read from the local system and the PWM value is calculated based on a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller mechanism. In other words, at the host, functions related not only to the temperature control but also to PCR protocol execution are processed through the graphical user inter-face (GUI) and the file input/output system [12, 13].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

PCR chip and its control system

The control system of the PCR chip consists of biochemical and user interface functions. The biochemical function process consists of the protocol and the control of the chip temperature. The PCR protocol carries out actions that run repetitively at a set temperature and a certain time. Temperature sensing is used to control the chip’s temperature via the heater or the cooling fan. The basic biochemical function was designed and created to al-low direct management, editing, and control through the user interface. These two functions are integrated in the embedded system as one process. The system of local-host structures through the PC is shown in Fig. 1. This system structure was adopted because the embedded system can be easily controlled through the PC’s user interface. The temperature of the PCR chip was controlled using the temperature measurements and a periodic control procedure for the heater and fan. The PCR chip temperature was set to be increased or decreased by approximately 10 °C/s, and the processing period was set to control the temperature with an error range of less than 0.5 °C within 50 ms [1418].

The micro-PCR chip had a four-layer structure (black matte PCB, packing tape, double-sided tape, cover), with holes in the modified cover. However, the proposed micro-PCR chip here has been updated to a six-layer structure that contains housing and double-sided tape to connect the housing with the four-layered PCB chip, as shown in Fig. 2. A heating circuit is attached at the very bottom, with the PCB base and a thermal sensor for sensing temperature [1922].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Structure of micro-PCR chip using black matte PCB. a Assembly diagram. b Cross section

To prevent the fluorescence substance from sticking to the PCB, packing tape made of polypropylene material was attached to top of the PCB, and since the actual tube used in the laboratory was also made of polypropylene, the same material was also used for the chip to minimize sensitivity to the material [18, 19, 21]. To set the height of the microfluidic channel to 400 μm, 200 μm thick double-sided tape was attached in two layers. The chamber was fabricated by covering it with a 500 μm thick polypropylene material. With the micro-PCR chips previously reported, PCR was performed by making a microfluidic channel using regular green PCB, and the PCR performance was verified through electrophoresis.

With a real-time PCR system and a conventional chip structure, any light received by a fluorescent detector on green PCB is reflected and acts as noise. This negatively affects the measurement through the overall signal-to-noise ratio. To prevent reflection outside the chamber, here the cover was painted with a black marker pen as shown in Fig. 2, so that the chamber and other components could be easily identified.

Table 1 shows the tapes used in the experiment. In this work, packing tape and double-sided tape were used in the chip, with the double-sided tape serving as an important material for the channel in the micro-PCR chip (Product No. 5620BWN, Nitto Denko Co. Ltd., Japan). As reported in the past, it can withstand high temperatures of 95 °C and pressure when expanding. The adhesive was acrylic, and the carrier of the double-sided tape was composed of PET. In the tube-shaped structure shown in Fig. 2, injection of the reagent is facilitated through the inlet/outlet holes on both sides. The chamber in which the PCR was performed in the middle was fabricated by drilling a U-shaped hole.
Table 1

Packing and double-sided tapes used in the experiment

Heading level

Manufacturer

Tape number

Adhesive type

Packing tape

3M

#309 Mini Clear

Acrylic adhesive

Double-sided tape

Nitto Denko Co. Ltd. (Japan)

No. 5620BWN (double coated tape: 0.2 mm)

High adhesion acrylic

The cover at the top part of the chip was made with polypropylene and had a thickness of 500 μm. To reduce the reflection of blue LED light during detection, the top of the cover was colored with a black marker pen except for the reservoir. This enabled a more accurate observation of the reservoir compared to the case when the cover was not colored.

Lastly, the PCB and the upper structure were fixed with the housing, and this was used as a passageway for the reagent injection and the extraction of PCR products.

Figure 3a shows the fluorescence measurement apparatus used in the experiment. Images were captured with a DSLR camera (Canon 1100D). To detect FAM fluorescence, a blue LED (9600 mcd) was illuminated diagonally. Ideally, the light would be right above the observation area; however, it may cover the detection part, making it difficult to take measurements. Furthermore, despite the ease in setting up the lighting, there may be uneven light distribution. However, this would not affect the comparison analysis of overall fluorescent brightness, as the summations of the averaged mean values were used in the PCR image analysis. Figure 3b shows a micro-PCR chip fabricated with black PCB. As shown schematically in Fig. 2, the chip was fabricated into a structure that allows for easy observation of an increase or decrease of fluorescence brightness by printing a white-silk legend on the chamber to distinguish the fluorescence measurement.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Fluorescence detection apparatus and micro-PCR chip. a Apparatus for real time PCR system. b Micro-PCR chip (black color microfluidic channel)

In this experiment, the PCR process was performed according to the following protocol. To control the temperature in the proposed system, the PCR process, consisting of denaturation, annealing, and extension, was conducted as shown in Table 2. A total of 40 cycles were carried out for 3 min of pre-denaturing at 95 °C, 10 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 30 s for 72 °C.
Table 2

PCR protocol used in the experiments

PCR process

Temperature (°C)

Time duration

1 cycle

95

3 min

40 cycles

95

10 s

60

30 s

72

30 s

1 cycle

95

10 s

50

30 s

The reagent used for PCR comprised 1 ng/15.84 μL of DNA (Chlamydia trachomatis), 18 μL of Master Mix, 10 pM/0.72 μL of primer F, 10 pM/0.72 μL of primer R, and 10 pM/0.72 μL of Probe (total 36 μL).

The previously suggested heating pattern for the chip was large enough to heat the entire microfluidic channel. However, in this study, the large heating pattern (hereafter, large-sized pattern) increased the time to reach the target temperature, so the pattern was reduced to a smaller size (hereafter, small-sized pattern) that would only heat the reservoir area. However, when PCR was performed, even though only a short time was needed to reach the target temperature, DNA amplification did not occur. Since factors such as temperature, contamination, and material affect DNA amplification results during PCR, close monitoring was required to ascertain if the target temperature was accurately reached and if a constant temperature was sustained precisely for the duration indicated in the PCR protocol. A change in temperature was observed during the monitoring process, so PID control was used to control the temperature. During this process, the inside of the reservoir suddenly started boiling during the heating phase, at 25–95 °C (25 °C is not set in the PCR protocol, but it is set in the PID control process and may be regarded as the initial ambient temperature). This was thought to be caused by the small-sized heating pat-tern with very small resistance; consequently, the energy absorbed per unit area was larger than with the original. Therefore, the actual reagent temperature (internal temperature of the chip) would have been much higher than that indicated by the temperature sensor. This was important for reducing the oversupplied energy to the reagent. Consequently, the initial 5 V was reduced to both 2 V and 2.5 V using the power supply, and then PCR was performed. After reducing the power supply, the PID value was set to the initial value for the large-sized pattern for PCR. A proportional derivative gain (Kd) was not given in previous experiments, but since the heating pattern size was small and the temperature quite unstable while approaching the target temperature, a Kd value was given for these experiments.

Figure 4 shows photographs of the changes in fluorescence brightness of the PCR cycle performed with the above PCR protocol. The experiment was conducted using the fluorescence photography setup shown in Fig. 3a, and the images were automatically captured with DSLR whenever a cycle proceeded at 72 °C (extension state of nucleic acid amplification); this is the middle amplification part of the PCR process, excluding the initial stage. As shown in the figure, it was confirmed that the fluorescence brightness increased as the PCR progressed. The total running time was 69 min 41 s (experiment conducted at 2 V) and 64 min 46 s (experiment conducted at 2.5 V). The total running time of the large-sized pat-tern was about 80 min, but this was decreased by 10–14 min after reducing the pattern size.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Changes of fluorescence brightness by PCR cycle. a 2 V power. b 2.5 V power

Results and discussion

As shown in Fig. 4, the change in fluorescence brightness was insignificant at the early stages, but it started getting brighter halfway through the reaction and DNA amplification was also detected. To analyze the experimental results, the increase in fluorescence brightness was calculated in three different ways, using the sum of means, median, and Bhattacharyya distance, and these were plotted for a quantitative representation.

Figure 5 shows the analysis of real-time PCR results according to the different voltages. A Matlab program was used to analyze the fluorescence brightness from the 40 images captured with DSLR. As the pictures taken were in color, the images were changed to grayscale and the reservoir area was masked to calculate the sum of the mean, median, and Bhattacharyya distance. Each of these values was represented with a plot. This study used the sum of means as a brightness comparison measure for the fluorochrome. In the image processing field, this is the most general means for comparing brightness.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Real-time PCR result analysis by different voltage–power. a Fluorescence detection analysis results of voltage of 2 V (period 5, duty 1). b Fluorescence detection analysis results of voltage of 2.5 V (period 4, duty 1)

Here, it was thought that the sum of means was insufficient for a quantitative comparison of brightness. For a meaningful comparison of the brightness of the 40 images obtained during PCR, we compared and analyzed the images using the brightness histogram of images. The Bhattacharyya distance, which is a measure indicating image similarity, was used to compare before and after images. Plot trends similar to those for the sum of means were observed.

Based on the current reagent concentration levels, real-time PCR generally shows an insignificant change in fluorochrome brightness from the beginning of the PCR to cycle 19. However, many reports indicate an exponential increase beginning with cycle 20. Figure 5a, b respectively show the PCR results for the voltages of 2 V and 2.5 V. Both figures showed an exponential curve at cycle 20 with the sum of means, which is a typical result for real-time PCR with current concentration levels. Based on this, it can be concluded that excessive energy during the preheating and denaturation stage caused the reagent to have a higher temperature within the channel than that indicated by the NTC thermistor. This caused the DNA amplification to fail. Furthermore, based on the two experiments, heating and cooling were controlled using the PWM control method. The appropriate control method was determined by decreasing the voltage for the experiments. Considering various situations, DNA amplification in real-time PCR was successful when the initial volt-age was reduced from 5 to 2 V or 2.5 V. This effect was the same as when the voltage was reduced by turning it on only 20% or 25% of the time, while it is off the remaining time. The latter case had a shorter PWM control duty ratio, so it would have the more appropriate voltage level.

Conclusions

Previously published studies indicated that a PCR test could be successful with micro-PCR chips made from double-sided tape. Furthermore, the green PCB was changed to a matte black PCB, and this minimized the noise. These enabled observations of a fluorochrome brightness change for each PCR cycle during real-time PCR. Reducing the time to attaining the target temperature will also reduce the overall PCR processing time. Therefore, the heating pattern size was decreased to more than one-quarter of the original size to reduce the heating pattern resistance and the time it takes to reach the target temperature. However, DNA amplification failed in this case, as the reagent was boiling in the chamber between 25 and 95 °C. Because the reduced resistance increased the energy per unit area, the actual reagent temperature in the chamber was higher than the temperature indicated by the NTC thermistor. This observation led to recognition of the importance of reducing the energy absorbed by the reagent. Heating and cooling were managed using PWM control, and the voltage was reduced and tested in order to find the appropriate PWM control method. The test had two conditions which reduced the maximum voltage to 2.5 V and 2 V. The voltage reduction has the same effect as reducing power by 25% and 20% using PWM control. Both cases had successful DNA amplification with real-time PCR. Typically, when a DNA concentration of 1 ng/μL is used, an exponential curve is observed from cycle 20. Here, an exponential increase was observed from cycle 20 at both lower voltages. However, the PWM control period was longer with 2 V; thus, using 2.5 V for PWM control should be more efficient. Based on these tests, using one-quarter of the voltage for PWM control (only 25% of PWM control is on) was selected for heating stages 25–95 °C, 60–72 °C, and 72–95 °C. DNA amplification was successfully achieved by reducing the duty ratio to 20% and 25% for PWM control. Afterward, the maximum value of PWM was subdivided into two ratios of 100% and 50%, and controlling experiments were conducted. Many factors determine the success of DNA amplification. Although it is important to achieve and preserve the tar-get temperature, it is also necessary to analyze for other factors, and more tests are needed to reduce the overall PCR processing time.

Abbreviations

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

LOC: 

lab-on-a-chip

PCB: 

printed circuit board

PET: 

polyethylene terephthalate

ADC: 

analog-to-digital converter

FET: 

field-effect transistor

PWM: 

pulse width modulation

HPET: 

high-precision event timer

PID: 

proportional integral derivative

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

FAM: 

fluorescein amidite

PC: 

personal computer

NTC: 

negative temperature coefficient-thermic

DSLR: 

digital single-lens reflex

LED: 

light emitting diode

Declarations

Declarations

Authors’ contributions JSH carried out the study and drafted the manuscript. HJS and YSK advised the experiments and data analysis. CYP and JDK supervised the study and proofed read the manuscript. CYP provided final approval of the version of submitted manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) under Industrial Technology Innovation Program (No. 10053617) and the publication of this article was sponsored by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning (NRF-2017R1A2B1010125).

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BioMedical Engineering OnLine Volume 17 Supplement 2, 2018: Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Engineering Innovation (ICBEI) 2016. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-17-supplement-2.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
(2)
Dept. of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
(3)
Bio-IT Research Center, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea

References

  1. Patko D, Mártonfalvi Z, Kovacs B, Vonderviszt F, Kellermayer M, Horvath R. Microfluidic channels laser-cut in thin double-sided tapes: cost-effective biocompatible fluidics in minutes from design to final integration with optical biochips. Sensors and Actuators B. 2014;196:352–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Focke M, Kosse D, Müller C, Reinecke H, Zengerle R, von Stetten F. Lab-on-a-foil: microfluidics on thin and flexible films. Lab Chip. 2010;10(11):1365–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ramsden JJ. Biomedical surfaces (engineering in medicine and biology). 1st ed. Norwood: Artech House; 2008. p. 270.Google Scholar
  4. Malmsten M. Biopolymers at interfaces. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003. p. 928.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang C, Xing D. Miniaturized PCR chips for nucleic acid amplification and analysis: latest advances and future trends. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(13):4223–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang C, Xing D, Li Y. Micropumps, microvalves, and micromixers within PCR microfluidic chips: advances and trends. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25(5):483–514.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kodzius R, Xiao K, Wu J, Yi X, Gong X, Foulds IG, et al. Inhibitory effect of common microfluidic materials on PCR outcome. Sensors Actuators B. 2012;161(1):349–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zou Q, Miao Y, Chen Y, Sridhar U, Chong CS, Chai T, et al. Micro-assembled multi-chamber thermal cycler for low-cost reaction chip thermal multiplexing. Sensors Actuators A. 2002;102(1–2):114–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hwang JS, Kim SY, Kim YS, Song HJ, Park CY, Kim JD. Implementation of PCB-based PCR chip using double-sided tape. Int J Control Autom. 2015;8(2):117–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang JS, Kim YS, Song HJ, Kim JD, Park CY. Fluorescence detection test by black printed circuit board based microfluidic channel for polymerase chain reaction. Technol Health Care. 2015;24(s1):S139–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hwang JS, Kim JD, Kim YS, Song HJ, Park CY. Black printed circuit board-based micro-polymerase chain reaction chip structure for fluorescence detection test. Electrophoresis. 2015;8(10):15–24.Google Scholar
  12. Plaisant C, Rose A, Shneiderman B, Vanniamparampil AJ. Low-effort, high-payoff user interface reengineering. IEEE Softw. 1997;14(4):66–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wills CE. User interface design for the engineer. In: Proceedings of ELECTRO’94. IEEE; 1994. p. 415–9.Google Scholar
  14. Kim JD, Lee YU, Kim S. Efficient hardware-software partitioning for a digital dental X-ray system. IEICE Trans Fundam Electron Commun Comput Sci. 2003;E86–A(4):859–65.Google Scholar
  15. Kim JD, Kim J, Lee G. Efficient control system for PCR chips. In: Becker H, Gray BL, eds. Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and medical microsystems IX. San Franscisco; 2011. p. 79290Y.Google Scholar
  16. Park CY, Kim JD, Ku JH, Kim YS, Song HJ, Kim JW. Printed circuit board-based polymerase chain reaction chip. Sens Lett. 2012;10(5):1197–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsieh TM, Luo CH, Huang FC, Wang JH, Chien LJ, Lee GB. Enhancement of thermal uniformity for a microthermal cycler and its application for polymerase chain reaction. Sensors Actuators B. 2008;130(2):848–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Shen K, Chen X, Guo M, Cheng J. A microchip-based PCR device using flexible printed circuit technology. Sensors Actuators B. 2005;105:251–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lian K, O’Rourke S, Sadler D, Eliacin M, Gamboa C, Terbrueggen R, et al. Integrated microfluidic components on a printed wiring board platform. Sensors Actuators B. 2009;138(1):21–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen PC, Park DS, You BH, Kim N, Park T, Soper SA, et al. Titer-plate formatted continuous flow thermal reactors: design and performance of a nanoliter reactor. Sensors Actuators B. 2010;149(1):291–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Chung KH, Choi YH, Jung MY. Natural convection PCR in a disposable polymer chip. In: Proceedings of IEEE sensors. IEEE; 2009. p. 1217–20.Google Scholar
  22. Wang JH, Chien LJ, Hsieh TM, Luo CH, Chou WP, Chen PH, et al. A miniaturized quantitative polymerase chain reaction system for DNA amplification and detection. Sensors Actuators B. 2009;141(1):329–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement