Validation of 24-hour ambulatory gait assessment in Parkinson's disease with simultaneous video observation
© Moore et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 June 2011
Accepted: 21 September 2011
Published: 21 September 2011
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder resulting in motor disturbances that can impact normal gait. Although PD initially responds well to pharmacological treatment, as the disease progresses efficacy often fluctuates over the course of the day, and clinical management would benefit from long-term objective measures of gait. We have previously described a small device worn on the shank that uses acceleration and angular velocity sensors to calculate stride length and identify freezing of gait in PD patients. In this study we extend validation of the gait monitor to 24-h using simultaneous video observation of PD patients.
A sleep laboratory was adapted to perform 24-hr video monitoring of patients while wearing the device. Continuous video monitoring of a sleep lab, hallway, kitchen and conference room was performed using a 4-camera security system and recorded to hard disk. Subjects (3) wore the gait monitor on the left shank (just above the ankle) for a 24-h period beginning around 5 pm in the evening. Accuracy of stride length measures were assessed at the beginning and end of the 24-h epoch. Two independent observers rated the video logs to identify when subjects were walking or lying down.
The mean error in stride length at the start of recording was 0.05 m (SD 0) and at the conclusion of the 24 h epoch was 0.06 m (SD 0.026). There was full agreement between observer coding of the video logs and the output from the gait monitor software; that is, for every video observation of the subject walking there was a corresponding pulse in the monitor data that indicated gait.
The accuracy of ambulatory stride length measurement was maintained over the 24-h period, and there was 100% agreement between the autonomous detection of locomotion by the gait monitor and video observation.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that results from a progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons, predominantly within the substantia nigra. One of the disabling clinical manifestations of PD is locomotor dysfunction; shortened stride length, increased variability of stride, reduced walking speed, and freezing of gait (a transient block of movement, particularly when initiating gait, turning, or negotiating an obstacle). Treatment of PD to a large extent focuses on replacing depleted dopamine at the striatum to improve locomotor function and maintain mobility for as long as possible . While dopamine replacement therapy (most commonly with the dopamine precursor levodopa) is initially effective, most patients develop motor fluctuations after 3 years of treatment . 'On' states, in which the motor symptoms of PD are effectively treated, may become shorter ('wearing off'), and periods of stiffness and difficulty of movement ('off' states) may occur unpredictably and more frequently .
Evaluation of long term medication response in PD usually takes the form of a patient diary, where the Parkinsonian state is noted as 'on', 'off' or 'on with dyskinesias (levodopa-induced involuntary movements)' [4, 5], but these subjective records can be unreliable . The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)  is commonly used in research studies (and to a lesser extent in the clinic) to intermittently assess PD symptoms. Despite widespread acceptance (70% of PD clinical trials utilized the UPDRS from 1994-1998 ) it is a relatively blunt instrument; analysis of gait is limited to assigning a single value between 0 (normal) and 4 (unable to walk, even with assistance) from brief clinical observation. Motor function in PD patients can fluctuate markedly over the course of a day, and an objective long-term measure of gait may provide more effective titration of dopaminergic medication, better comparative treatment evaluations, and possibly a more accurate diagnosis of PD when administering the levodopa challenge test .
Wrist [10, 11] and belt  mounted accelerometers have been used for long-term monitoring of gross motor function in PD, but this approach is unable to determine 'off' from 'on' states. A more 'brute force' approach (six tri-axial accelerometers; mounted on both upper arms, both upper legs, the sternum and one wrist) has been used to distinguish between 'on' and 'off' stages in PD , but the complexity of multi-segment accelerometry limits long-term use in the community. We have previously described a device for ambulatory assessment of gait using an array of linear and angular sensors (multi-axis accelerometer and gyroscope) placed on the lateral shank just above the ankle , which determines the length of every stride taken. In Parkinson's patients, the gait monitor has demonstrated sensitivity to motor fluctuations (rapid changes in stride length) following levodopa administration over short epochs (up to 3 h) [15, 16] and can reliably detect episodes of freezing of gait from the frequency characteristics of vertical leg acceleration . As motor fluctuations in PD occur over the entire day, the aim of the current study was to validate ambulatory monitoring of gait in PD patients over a 24-h epoch by a direct comparison with simultaneous video observation.
Disease Duration (yr)
Levodopa Dose Equivalency (mg)
2.2 Gait monitor
A prototype gait monitor was developed by IM Systems based on a design described previously . The sensor array consisted of a dual axis gyroscope (InvenSense IDG-300) and triaxial accelerometer (Freescale Semiconductor MMA7260QT). A 12 bit A/D converter sampled linear and angular leg movement at a rate of 100 Hz and saved the digital data on an SD flash memory card. An onboard 8-bit microcontroller was programmed to communicate with the PC software and, in conjunction with a real time clock, manage the start and stop of the data logging. This allowed the implementation of advanced features such as delayed recording, and accurate start and stop timing. The entire device, including a rechargeable lithium ion battery, was housed in a plastic enclosure (66 mm × 80 mm × 28 mm) and weighed 130 grams. Locomotor activity was identified by the appearance of power in the vertical acceleration trace in a narrow band centered on 2 Hz ; periods when the subject was lying down were determined from the change in baseline vertical acceleration from 9.8 m/s2 to close to zero. Stride length was calculated from vertical acceleration and pitch angular velocity of the leg .
2.3 Stride length accuracy
Subjects (9 controls and 4 PD patients) were fitted with a chalk 'spur' attached to the rear of the left shoe, and asked to walk along a 30-m hallway while varying the length of their steps. The gait monitor was also worn on the left leg. After testing, the length of each stride was determined by measurement of the distance between successive chalk marks on the floor, and compared to the stride length determined by the gait monitor .
2.4 24-h ambulatory gait monitoring
The sleep laboratory at IM Systems was adapted to perform 24-hr video monitoring of PD patients while wearing the gait monitor. The sleep lab is a one-bed research facility with an armchair, TV and DVD player. Restroom/shower and kitchen facilities were adjacent. In addition, a 30-m hallway and conference room were available for patient use. Continuous video monitoring of the sleep lab, hallway, kitchen and conference room was performed using an integrated security system (VSS40DM 4-Camera DVR System, Supercircuits Inc, TX) and recorded to hard disk. The three PD patients participating in the 24-h study arrived at IM Systems in the early evening (around 5:00 pm). Following instrumentation, the 24 h period began with an accuracy validation along the 30-m hallway (see section 2.3 above), with the subject wearing the chalk 'spur' to allow a comparison between actual and measured stride length. Subjects stayed within IM Systems' premises over the 24-h epoch, and performed a final accuracy test prior to ending participation in the study the next evening.
Two independent observers (who were not privy to the gait monitor data) viewed the 24-h digital video records of the 3 PD subjects and independently coded gait activity (onset and cessation of locomotion) and when the subject was lying down, with a resolution of 1 s. If the subject walked into an area outside of the view of the surveillance cameras (the restroom or other blind spots), or walked into view from an unmonitored area, the gait activity was coded as a partial observation. After coding, the results from the two observers were compared and found to be almost identical; any instances of disagreement (a missed episode of locomotion, for example) were reconciled by both observers reviewing the period of video in question. The leg movement data from the gait monitor was processed to determine stride length and the onset and cessation of locomotor activity , and was synchronized with the video observation data (within 1 s) by alignment of the point at which the logger was activated by a button press (captured on video). In addition, the three PD patients wore the gait device for 24-h during normal daily activities in the community. Participants were requested to maintain a log of activities and when Parkinson's-related medications were taken.
Results and Discussion
The results of this study demonstrate the viability of ambulatory gait monitoring using an integrated sensor array/data logger placed on the lateral shank over periods of up to 24-h. Stride length accuracy was maintained over 24-h of continuous gait monitoring and there was full agreement between autonomous detection of locomotion (and periods of lying down) and video observation. Participants reported no discomfort or inconvenience wearing the device for extended periods, whether in the laboratory or during community activities. Data from 24-h community monitoring showed differences in motor fluctuations consistent with patient history; stride length was consistent over the day in a patient with late onset, short duration PD, whereas a patient with a younger onset and longer duration exhibited considerable fluctuations in stride length that appeared temporally linked to levodopa administration.
The accuracy of ambulatory stride length measurement in PD patients was maintained over a period of 24-h. There was 100% agreement between the autonomous detection of locomotion and periods of lying down from shank-mounted accelerometer output and video observation by two independent raters. Long-term monitoring of gait in PD provides an objective dynamic assessment of motor fluctuations and may prove a useful adjunct in the management of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders
Supported by NIH STTR Grant 1R41NS59086-1A1 and the National Space Biomedical Research Institute through NASA contract NCC 9-58 (Dr. Steven Moore), and a grant from the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation (Dr. Hamish MacDougall). The authors wish to thank Gus Aguirre and Lynn Smith at IM Systems for acquisition of the data.
- Poewe W, Antonini A, Zijlmans JC, Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets F: Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: an old drug still going strong. Clin Interv Aging 2010, 5: 229–238.Google Scholar
- McColl CD, Reardon KA, Shiff M, Kempster PA: Motor response to levodopa and the evolution of motor fluctuations in the first decade of treatment of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2002, 17: 1227–1234. 10.1002/mds.10244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nutt JG: On-off phenomenon: relation to levodopa pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Ann Neurol 1987, 22: 535–540. 10.1002/ana.410220415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown RG, MacCarthy B, Jahanshahi M, Marsden CD: Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with parkinsonism. Arch Neurol 1989, 46: 955–959.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Golbe LI, Pae J: Validity of a mailed epidemiological questionnaire and physical self-assessment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1988, 3: 245–254. 10.1002/mds.870030309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goetz CG, Stebbins GT, Blasucci LM, Grobman MS: Efficacy of a patient-training videotape on motor fluctuations for on-off diaries in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1997, 12: 1039–1041. 10.1002/mds.870120631View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fahn S, Elton RL, members. Up: Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. In Recent developments in Parkinson's disease. Volume 2. Edited by: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Goldstein M, Calne DB. Florham park, NJ: Macmillan healthcare Information; 1987:153–163.Google Scholar
- Mitchell SL, Harper DW, Lau A, Bhalla R: Patterns of outcome measurement in Parkinson's disease clinical trials. Neuroepidemiology 2000, 19: 100–108. 10.1159/000026244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke CE, Davies P: Systematic review of acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000, 69: 590–594. 10.1136/jnnp.69.5.590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Hilten JJ, Middelkoop HA, Kerkhof GA, Roos RA: A new approach in the assessment of motor activity in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991, 54: 976–979. 10.1136/jnnp.54.11.976View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoff JI, van den Plas AA, Wagemans EA, van Hilten JJ: Accelerometric assessment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2001, 16: 58–61. 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<58::AID-MDS1018>3.0.CO;2-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saito N, Yamamoto T, Sugiura Y, Shimizu S, Shimizu M: Lifecorder: a new device for the long-term monitoring of motor activities for Parkinson's disease. Intern Med 2004, 43: 685–692. 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keijsers NL, Horstink MW, Gielen SC: Ambulatory motor assessment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2006, 21: 34–44. 10.1002/mds.20633View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moore ST, MacDougall H, Gracies J-M, Cohen H, Ondo W: Long-term monitoring of gait in Parkinson's Disease. Gait Posture 2007, 26: 200–207. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moore ST, MacDougall H, Gracies J-M, Ondo W: Locomotor response to levodopa in fluctuating Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res 2008, 184: 469–478. 10.1007/s00221-007-1113-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ondo WG, Shinawi L, Moore S: Comparison of orally dissolving carbidopa/levodopa (Parcopa) to conventional oral carbidopa/levodopa: A single-dose, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Mov Disord 2010, 25: 2724–2727. 10.1002/mds.23158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moore ST, MacDougall HG, Ondo WG: Ambulatory monitoring of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci Meth 2008, 167: 340–348. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacDougall HG, Moore ST: Marching to the beat of the same drummer: the spontaneous tempo of human locomotion. J Appl Physiol 2005, 99: 1164–1173. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00138.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.