Table 2 A comparison between previous literature and our proposed models (bolded values) with regard to the classification of a minimum of four in-bed postures, containing at least supine, prone, right, and left
Year & Refs. | # Subs | # Postures | Algorithm | Cross-Validation Method | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 [12] | 12 | 4 | FFAN\(^1\) | LOSO | ACC\(^2\): 97.9% |
2020 [13] | 7 | 4 | kNN\(^3\) | LOSO | ACC: 79.02% |
2021 [11] | 1 | 6 | Inception-v3 | Holdout | ACC: 90.5% |
2022 [14] | 6 | 4 | SRC\(^4\) | 6-Fold & LOSO | ER\(^5\): 0.09 |
Proposed Models | 10 | 6 | I3D DNN \(^6\) | LOSO | ACC: 82.22% |
LOEO | ACC: 77.78% | ||||
ResNet-18 | LOSO | ACC: 92.07% | |||
LOEO | ACC: 85.37% |