Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included trials (n = 5)

From: Cycling using functional electrical stimulation therapy to improve motor function and activity in post-stroke individuals in early subacute phase: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Study

Design

Participants

Interventiona

Outcome measuresb

Frequency and duration

Characteristics

Bauer et al. [17]

RCT

n = 37

Age (y) = 61 (12)

Time since stroke (days) = 52 (44)

Early subacute phase

Exp: cycling using FEST alone

20 min × 3/wk x 4wk

Con: cycling without functional electrical stimulation

20 min × 3/wk x 4wk

End treatment (4wk)c and 6wk

Affected leg

Muscles: knee flexors and extensors

Frequency: 20–60 Hz

Pulse width: 300–450 µs

Current: visible muscle contraction below the pain threshold

Motricity Index (0–100)

10MWT (m/s)

Ambrosini et al. [18]

RCT

n = 52

Age (y) = 74 (12)

Time since stroke (days) = 16 (10)

Early subacute phase

3wk and end treatment (6 wk)c, and 30 wk

Exp: cycling using FEST + exercise programs (stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, cycling and walking, and upper limb rehabilitation)

(20 min + 70 min) × 5/wk x 6wk

Con: exercise programs (stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, cycling and walking, and upper limb rehabilitation)

70 min × 5/wk x 6wk

Affected and unaffected leg

Muscles: knee flexors, ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors

Frequency: 20 Hz

Pulse width: 400 µs

Current: Affected leg: visible contraction under pain tolerance threshold

Unaffected leg: above the sensory threshold

Motricity Index (0–100)

10MWT (m/s)

6MWT (m)

Berg Balance Scale (0–56)

Trunk Control Test (0–21)

Peri et al. [19]

RCT

n = 16

Age (y) = 74 (10)

Time since stroke (days) = 15 (4)

Early subacute phase

Exp: cycling using FEST + exercise programs (strength and stretching exercises, gait training, stairs, hand rehabilitation)

(25 min + 50 min) × 5/wk x 3wk

Con: exercise programs (strength and stretching exercises, gait training, stairs, hand rehabilitation)

75 min × 5/wk x 3wk

End treatment (3 wk)c

Affected and unaffected leg

Muscles: knee flexors and extensors, ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors

Frequency: NR

Pulse width: NR

Current: Affected leg: maximum intensity tolerated

Unaffected leg: visible muscle contraction

6MWT (m/s)

6MWT (m)

FIM (18–126)

Lee et al. [24]

RCT

n = 16

Age (y) = 63 (14)

Time since stroke (days) = 60 (43)

Early subacute phase

Exp: cycling using FEST alone

30 min × 5/wk x 4wk

Con: cycling without functional electrical stimulation

30 min × 5/wk x 4wk

End treatment (4wk)c

Affected leg

Muscles: hip extensor, knee flexors and extensors, ankle plantar flexors

Frequency: 60 Hz

Pulse width: 300 µs

Current: maximal comfortably tolerated

6MWT (m)

Berg Balance Scale (0 to 56)

Korean-Modified Barthel Index (0—100)

Zhang et al. [25]

RCT

n = 66

Age (y) = 56 (11)

Time since stroke (days) = 43 (5)

Early subacute phase

Exp: cycling using FEST + exercise programs (exercise therapy, physical therapy, and traditional treatment)

(30 min + NR) × 6/wk x 8wk

Con: cycling with functional electrical stimulation sham + exercise programs (exercise therapy, physical therapy, and traditional treatment)

(30 min + NR) × 6/wk x 8wk

4wk and end treatment (8wk)c

Affected leg

Muscles: knee flexors and extensors, ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors

Frequency: 15 a 50 Hz

Pulse width: 200 a 300 µs

Current: visible muscle contraction

Modified Barthel index (0 to 100)

  1. Con control group, Exp experimental group, FEST functional electrical stimulation therapy, FIM functional independence measure, NR not reported, RCT randomized controlled trial, 10MWT 10 Meter Walk Test, 6MWT Six Minute Walk Test
  2. aOnly the groups related to the current study objectives are shown
  3. bOnly the outcomes relevant to this review are listed
  4. cTime points considered in this systematic review