Skip to main content

Table 4 The ensemble models accuracies with a confidence interval of 95% obtained after ROC analysis using weighted voting

From: Assessment of the functional severity of coronary lesions from optical coherence tomography based on ensembled learning

No. of feat

Class probabilities for all features using the mean ROC cutoff values (M1) (%)

Class probabilities using the corresponding ROC cutoff for each feature (M2) (%)

Crisp labels for all features using the mean ROC cutoff value (M3) (%)

1

75.49 (66.32,83.0)

75.49 (66.32,83.0)

73.53 (64.23,81.0)

2

76.47 (67.37,84.0)

72.55 (63.19,80.0)

73.53 (64.23,81.0)

3

78.43 (69.5,85.0)

73.53 (64.23,81.0)

79.41 (70.57,86.0)

4

77.45 (68.43,84.0)

71.57 (62.16,79.0)

74.51 (65.27,82.0)

5

75.49 (66.32,83.0)

68.63 (59.09,77.0)

81.37 (72.73,88.0)

6

73.53 (64.23,81.0)

69.61 (60.1,78.0)

79.41 (70.57,86.0)

7

75.49 (66.32,83.0)

71.57 (62.16,79.0)

80.39 (71.65,87.0)

8

73.53 (64.23,81.0)

70.59 (61.13,79.0)

80.39 (71.65,87.0)

9

75.49 (66.32,83.0)

72.55 (63.19,80.0)

80.39 (71.65,87.0)

10

76.47 (67.37,84.0)

69.61 (60.1,78.0)

80.39 (71.65,87.0)

11

75.49 (66.32,83.0)

69.61 (60.1,78.0)

80.39 (71.65,87.0)

12

77.45 (68.43,84.0)

70.59 (61.13,79.0)

79.41 (70.57,86.0)

13

77.45 (68.43,84.0)

71.57 (62.16,79.0)

80.39 (71.65,87.0)