Skip to main content

Table 3 Accuracies of the tenfold individual feature models

From: Assessment of the functional severity of coronary lesions from optical coherence tomography based on ensembled learning

No

Feature input

ML algorithm

Mean Acc

Standard deviation

Max

Min

1

Minimal lumen diameter

Scale SVM

63.43

6.46

71.57

53.92

2

Proximal radius rapport

Poly SVM

64.31

5.14

71.57

53.92

3

Radius rapport

Poly SVM

65.59

4.39

71.57

54.9

4

Percentage diameter reduction

Poly SVM

66.18

1.4

68.63

63.73

5

Mean radius

Decision Tree

62.75

6.75

71.57

53.92

6

Minimum lumen radius

Naive Bayes

60.59

6.06

71.57

53.92

7

Weight

Naive Bayes

64.51

4.27

69.61

53.92

8

Mean lumen radius for stenosis region

Scale SVM

67.35

2.01

71.57

64.71

9

Mean radius per length

Scale SVM

61.76

6

71.57

53.92

10

Maximum radius rapport

K-nearest neighbors

64.31

5.79

71.57

53.92

11

Stenosis lesion length

Poly SVM

66.27

1.53

68.63

63.73

12

Hematocrit level

Decision Tree

62.25

6.59

71.57

53.92

13

Interventricular septum

Scale SVM

64.61

4.54

71.57

53.92

14

Maximum lumen radius

AdaBoost

65.39

2.98

69.61

58.82

15

Smoking

Scale SVM

55.5

4.8

59.8

47.52

16

Dyslipidemia

Naive Bayes

54.71

6.51

60.54

43.88

17

AHT

Scale SVM

53.53

3.72

56.86

47.34

18

Diastolic pattern

Naive Bayes

52.88

4.44

56.86

45.5

19

Age

Linear SVM

51.17

3.64

54.43

45.11

20

Diabetes

Random Forest 60

50.33

4.01

53.92

43.66

21

Distal area

Decision Tree

50.53

3.79

53.92

44.22

22

Echo EF

Poly SVM

49.59

4.83

53.92

41.56

23

Hb

Linear SVM

48.72

5.8

53.92

39.06

24

Hight

Random Forest 60

51.43

2.78

53.92

46.8

25

Proximal area

Linear SVM

50.52

3.8

53.92

44.2

26

Sex

Linear SVM

48.59

5.94

53.92

38.7