Table 1 Evaluation parameters of the m-HOS algorithm and the optimal thresholds
From: Differences in intestinal motility during different sleep stages based on long-term bowel sounds
Participants | \(Accurary\)(%) | \(Sensitivity\)(%) | \(Specificity\)(%) | Optimal thresholds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 97.96 | 99.24 | 91.95 | 75.57 |
2 | 99.14 | 98.23 | 98.82 | 29.00 |
3 | 95.73 | 98.13 | 90.13 | 828.37 |
4 | 93.95 | 91.35 | 94.98 | 55.19 |
5 | 93.33 | 96.94 | 84.84 | 142.05 |
6 | 91.54 | 89.62 | 92.36 | 85.01 |
7 | 98.56 | 99.59 | 96.22 | 61.37 |
8 | 99.48 | 99.73 | 98.78 | 71.69 |
9 | 98.98 | 98.71 | 99.10 | 64.37 |
10 | 97.23 | 95.49 | 97.64 | 43.39 |
11 | 95.72 | 99.09 | 91.02 | 356.13 |
12 | 98.27 | 98.41 | 98.28 | 126.47 |
13 | 92.34 | 97.42 | 87.75 | 357.21 |
14 | 98.22 | 99.42 | 95.95 | 413.83 |
Mean (Stand deviation) | 96.46 (2.60) | 97.24 (2.99) | 94.13 (4.37) | Â |