Table 1 Identification performance compared to clinical inspection for each patient and overall without subdividing by asynchrony type, which is in Table 3
From: Automated evaluation of typical patient–ventilator asynchronies based on lung hysteretic responses
Patient | Total breaths | # Asynchronous | # No asynchrony | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 500 | 154 | 346 | 99.4% | 99.4% | 99.4% |
2 | 500 | 22 | 478 | 95.5% | 99.8% | 99.6% |
3 | 500 | 89 | 411 | 92.1% | 99.3% | 98.0% |
4 | 500 | 496 | 4 | 99.0% | N/A | 98.6% |
5 | 500 | 274 | 226 | 93.8% | 99.6% | 96.4% |
6 | 500 | 231 | 269 | 94.8% | 93.7% | 94.2% |
7 | 500 | 218 | 282 | 99.5% | 96.1% | 97.6% |
8 | 500 | 433 | 67 | 94.9% | 92.5% | 94.6% |
9 | 500 | 216 | 284 | 97.2% | 97.5% | 97.4% |
10 | 500 | 10 | 490 | 90.0% | 97.1% | 97.0% |
11 | 500 | 0 | 500 | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Overall | 5500 | 2143 | 2857 | 96.6% | 97.8% | 97.3% |