Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the included studies (n = 13)

From: The efficacy and safety of telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a overviews of systematic reviews

First author

Year

Country

Number of original studies (sample size)

Research type

Intervening measure

Comparison intervention

Outcome

Quality evaluation tool

McKeon, et al. [18]

2021

America

28 (6418)

RCT

Tele-rehabilitation

Face-to-face rehabilitation

WOMAC, KOOS, TUGT, satisfaction,cost

Not specified

McDonnell, et al. [19]

2022

Ireland

11 (1054)

RCT

Video-conferencing

Face-to-face rehabilitation

Satisfaction,VAS, WOMAC,TUGT

Cochrane bias risk assessment tool

Jansson, et al. [20]

2022

Finland

9 (1266)

RCT

Tele-rehabilitation

Face-to-face outpatient treatment

Joint flexion and extension, TUGT, VAS, life quality,WOMAC, KOOS

JBI randomized controlled trial evaluation tool

Jiang, et al. [26]

2018

China

4 (422)

RCT

Tele-rehabilitation

Face-to-face rehabilitation

VAS, WOMAC, active buckling and extension

Jadad scale

Gazendam, et al. [27]

2022

Canada

9 (835)

RCT

Virtual reality rehabilitation

Face-to-face rehabilitation

VAS, WOMAC, KOOS, cost

Cochrane risk assessment tool

Wang, et al. [30]

2021

Australia

11 (1020)

RCT

Internet rehabilitation

Face-to-face outpatient rehabilitation, home visits or routine care

Pain, knee flexion and extension, quality of life, satisfaction

JBI randomized controlled trial evaluation tool

Jing, et al. [21]

2019

China

6 (601)

RCT

Tele-rehabilitation

Routine outpatient physical therapy or home visit

WOMAC, joint flexion and extension, VAS, KOOS, TUGT

Cochrane Manual 5.1.0

Wang, et al. [23]

2019

Australia

21 (2188)

RCT

Tele-rehabilitation

Routine care

VAS, TUGT, WOMAC, life quality

PEDro scale

Tsang, et al. [24]

2022

China

11 (1825)

RCT

Tele-rehabilitation

Standard rehabilitation therapy

VAS, WOMAC, KOOS, cost, adverse event

PEDro scale

Peng, et al. [28]

2021

China

8 (805)

RCT

Virtual reality rehabilitation

Standard rehabilitation therapy

VAS, WOMAC, TUGT, life quality

PEDro scale

Blasco, et al. [29]

2021

Spain

6 (312)

RCT, case–control study

Virtual reality rehabilitation

Standard rehabilitation therapy

Pain, patient satisfaction

PEDro scale

Shukla, et al. [25]

2017

India

6 (408)

RCT, observational study

Tele-rehabilitation

Conventional rehabilitation

Active knee flexion and extension, VAS, life quality

Cochrane bias risk tool

Yoo, et al. [22]

2022

Korea

9 (230)

RCT, prospective study

Robot-assisted rehabilitation

Usual care

VAS

Cochrane bias risk tool, NOS scale

  1. JBI Joanna Briggs Institute model of evidence-based healthcare, KOOS knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, RCT randomized controlled trial, TKA total knee arthroplasty, TUGT timed up and go test, VAS pain visual analogue score, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index