Skip to main content

Table 5 Data-driven precision diagnosis in digestive diseases based on metabolomics

From: Data-driven decision-making for precision diagnosis of digestive diseases

First author, year

Disease

n

Data source and specific task

ML method

Diagnostic performance

Refs.

Jiménez, 2013

CRC

26

Metabolic profiles of tumor and adjacent tissues by NMR spectroscopy; classification based on discriminant metabolites

OPLS–DA

AUC: 0.910

[134]

Yuan, 2021

ESCC

525

Serum lipidomics data; classification based on a panel of 12 lipid biomarkers, age and gender

SVM/PCA

AUC: 0.818–0.966

[135]

Takis, 2018

Diffuse abdominal pain

64

Serum metabolomics data by NMR spectroscopy; classification by metabolomics fingerprint

OPLS–DA/PCA

Accuracy > 90%

[136]

Wang, 2023

ESCC

1104

Serum metabolomics data by LC–MS; classification based on digital images of metabolome profiles

CNN

AUC: 0.950

[137]

Yang, 2022

CRC

99

LC–MS-based plasma lipidomics data; classification based on 14 lipids

PLS/RF/SVM/KNN

Accuracy: 72.6–100%

[138]

Huang, 2021

GC

400

Untargeted metabolomics data of plasma; classification based on 6 metabolites with clinical indicators

LR/RF

AUC: 0.830

[139]

Yu, 2023

GC

301

Serum metabolomics data by MS; classification based on 12 differential metabolites

PCA/SVM/RF/LASSO

AUC: 0.893

[140]

Matsumoto, 2023

GC

101

Hydrophilic metabolites quantified by LC–TOFMS; classification based on 3 metabolites

SVM

AUC: 0.885–0.915

[141]

Pan, 2022

GC

280

Target bile acid metabolomics data of serum; classification based on 6 bile acids

RF/LASSO/OPLS–DA

AUC: 0.940–1.000

[142]

Zhao, 2022

ESCC

239

Multi-platform metabolomics data of serum; classification based on 5 metabolites

RF/LASSO/PCA

AUC: 0.873 (95% CI, 0.825–0.925)

[143]

  1. Full names of abbreviations are given in the Abbreviations section of the manuscript