Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of study characteristics, specimen demographic details, and main findings or summaries

From: The role of bone marrow on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone: a systematic review

Experimental methods

Authors, year of publication

Journal of publication

Types of specimens

Numbers of specimens

Gender

Age

Anatomic sites

Main findings or summaries

FEM under compressive loading

Kasra et al. 1998

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

A 3D-FEM of a rod-strut trabecular structure filled with bone marrow

Vertebrae trabecular bone

Hydraulic stiffening of trabecular bone due to the presence of bone marrow occurs when the applied loading rate is higher than the pore fluid diffusion rate

Dynamic compressive strain cycles

Ochoa et al. 1991

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Intact bone samples

26 limbs

About 2 years

Femoral heads (mature dogs)

A nature stiffening mechanism of viscous fluid may be present in intact trabecular bone, and the overall stiffness reflects the material properties of both the porous solid matrix and entrapped fluid

Static and dynamic tests

Swanson et al. 1966

Medical & biological engineering & computing

Intact bone samples

4

Femora

Trabecular bone is not hydraulically strengthened by the presence of bone marrow under moderate and physiological loading conditions such as normal walking

Small amplitude mechanical excitation

Pugh et al. 1973

Journal of Biomechanics

Bone slabs

20

Distal ends of the human left femora

The fluid in the intertrabecular spaces has no effect on the dynamic mechanical behavior

Stress-relaxation and cyclic loading

Metzger, Schwaner, et al. 2015

Journal of Biomechanics

Intact bone samples

9

6–8 months

Porcine femurs

The deformation of the pores under external forces would induce the motion of the fluid-like marrow, resulting in pressure and velocity gradients

Compressive loads tests

Kazarian et al. 1977

Spine

Intact bone samples

48

Male

26, 27, 32 and 38 years

Thoracic vertebrae

The mechanical behavior of the vertebral centrum was dependent on the strain rate. This was due to the hydraulic strengthening caused by the internal marrow at the higher strain rates

Split-Hopkinson bar testing and FEM

Pilcher, et al. 2010

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Cylindrical and cubic trabecular bone samples

34

Bovine tibia (proximal region)

The strength of trabecular bone significantly increases when testing at high strain rates in the range of 102–103 s−1

FEM under compressive loading

Rabiatul, et al. 2022

Journal of Materials: Design And Applications

A 3D-constructed FEM

Bovine femur bones

The fluid flow of bone marrow not only causes shear stress to the trabecular structure, but also has a certain hydraulic stiffening effect that occurs due to the presence of bone marrow

Porous elastic model

Hong et al. 2001

KSME International Journal

A cylindrical trabecular bone sample

1

Calf vertebral trabecular bone

The difference in pore pressure generation resulted in a significant increase in the predicted total stress at the fastest strain rate (10 per second)

A one-dimensional poro-elastic model

Hong et al. 1998

KSME International Journal

Trabecular bone

The total stress–strain behavior of trabecular bone was greatly affected by the applied strain rate. The incorporation of the fluid effect is recommended

FEM under compressive loading

Pense et al. 2017

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials

Cubic bone samples

7

Female

61 years

Human femoral neck

There is a significant strain rate-dependent poro-elastic hydraulic stiffening of bone tissue due to the fluid in trabecular bone pores

FEM under a realistic impact load

Haider et al. 2013

Journal of Biomechanics

Intact bone samples

1

Cadaveric femur

Hydraulic strengthening has little effect on whole bones in realistic fall conditions, as this load condition causes no volumetric strain

FEM under stress relaxation experiments

Sandino et al. 2015

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials

Cubes of trabecular bone (10 mm side-length)

33

64.35 (49–85)

Human distal tibia

The contribution of viscoelasticity (fluid flow-independent mechanism) to the mechanical response of the tissue is significantly greater than the contribution of the poro-elasticity (fluid flow-dependent mechanism)

FEM and in vitro permeability experiments

Sandino et al. 2014

Journal of Biomechanics

Cubes of trabecular bone (10 mm side-length)

23

Human distal tibia

The changes in the trabecular bone microarchitecture have an exponential relationship with permeability

FEM for mechanical stimuli of trabecular bone

Sandino et al. 2017

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials

Cubes of trabecular bone (10 mm side-length)

76

14 females, 6 males

68 ± 15 (49–95) years

Human distal tibia

With variations in the morphology of the trabecular bone, such as an increase of 30% porosity, there is a significant decrease in the mechanical stimuli of the tissue when subjected to constant strain

A one-dimensional poro-elastic model of trabecular bone

Lim et al. 1998

Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

Trabecular bone is poro-elastic and the fluid effect on the mechanical behavior at the continuum level is significant

Sinusoidal strain excitation

Ochoa et al. 1997

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Intact bone samples

38

About 2 years

Femoral heads (mature dogs)

Hydraulic effects measured in vivo accounted for an average of 19 percent of the load-bearing capabilities of the structure over the frequency range considered

A fluid structure interaction model

Birmingham et al. 2013

Annals of Biomechanical Engineering

Lower bone mass leads to an increase in the shear stress generated within the marrow, while a decrease in bone marrow viscosity reduces this generated shear stress

Fluid–structure interaction models (FEM under compressive loading)

Metzger, Kreipke, et al. 2015

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Cubes of trabecular bone (4 mm side-length)

2

Proximal and distal femoral neck

Compression of the bone caused a flow of the marrow within the trabecular pore space. The marrow moved slowly, with velocities lower than 0.1 mm/s, which was accompanied by concomitant shear stress and pressure gradient

Non-destructive impact loads

Bryant 1983

Journal of Biomechanics

Intact bone samples

Sheep tibiae

In non-destructive impact loading, low marrow pressures would provide only a trivial amount of hydraulic strengthening

Dynamic loading cycles

Ochoa et al. 1991

The Journal Of Rheumatology

Intact bone samples

24

At least 2 years

Hind limbs of dogs

The removal of fluid phase decreases the stiffness of trabecular bone in intact canine femoral head specimens (a more than 30% decrease in stiffness)

A load of physiologic magnitude

Nuccion et al. 2001

Orthopedics

Intact bone samples

24

Femora of mature dogs

Removal of the intraosseous fluid decrease the mechanical stiffness of canine trabecular bone (a 40% decrease in stiffness)

Hydrostatic pressure response

Simkin 1985

Journal of Biomechanics

Intact bone samples

20

4 female, 6 male

Arms and shoulders of dogs

When the trabecular bone deforms under unconstrained load, fluid will flow freely and will play no mechanical role as surrounding trabeculae are compressed. while enclosed fluid will directly transmit a portion of the loading rate

Hydraulic resistance testing

Ochia et al. 2006

Spine

Intact bone samples

21

67.4 ± 12.0 years, 73.3 ± 8.8 years

Human lumbar vertebrae (L3 and L4)

Marrow flow can be biphasic in nature at flow rates, and that marrow flow could potentially damage trabeculae and weaken the vertebral body during high-speed injury events

Compression testing

Deligianni et al.1994

Biorheology

Cylindrical and cubic specimens

22

10 females

55–70 years

Femoral heads

Under a step load and at strain rate, 10 min−1, the marrow can bear about 25% of the applied load

Solid and fluid constitutive models

Metzger et al. 2016

Journal of Biomechanics

Cubes (3 mm side-length)

2

Human femurs

The results differed substantially between elastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic constitutive models, even when using the same modulus

Unconfined compression test and FEM simulation

Halgrin et al. 2012

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials

Cubic trabecular bone samples

48

Less than 24 months

Bovine ribs

The bone marrow contributes to decrease the mechanical properties of trabecular bone, i.e., 26% for the elastic modulus, 38% for the maximum compressive stress, and 33% for the average stress

Unconfined compression test

Bravo et al. 2019

Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express

Cubic trabecular bone samples

60

About 5 months of age

Porcine femur bones

The samples extracted marrow and replaced with saline solution have higher mechanical properties

Unconfined compression test

Linde et al. 1993

Journal of Biomechanics

Cylindrical trabecular bone samples

74

Male

35 and 61 years

Human proximal tibial

Defatted trabecular bone specimens contribute to a 30% increase in stiffness and a 50% decrease in viscoelastic dissipation

Compression test and FEM

Chaari et al. 2007

International Journal Of Crashworthiness

Cylindrical trabecular bone samples

97

Beef ribs

The fluid influence is essentially observed in the last compression stage, when the sample’s strain is higher than 30%

Semi-constrained compression test

Carter et al. 1977

The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery

Cylindrical trabecular bone samples

124

Human tibial plateaus and bovine femoral condyles

The presence of marrow increased the strength, modulus, and energy absorption of specimens only at the highest strain rate of 10.0 per second

Dynamic compressive loading (FEM simulation)

Laouira et al. 2015

Computer Methods In Biomechanics And Biomedical Engineering

Cubic trabecular bone samples

1

Porcine femoral neck

Confined marrow plays a non-negligible role upon the mechanical properties of trabecular bone

Static and dynamic load

Bryant 1988

Journal of Engineering In Medicine

Human and sheep long bones

2

Male for human bones

50 years for human bones

Sheep tibia and human radius

Hydraulic strengthening and viscous resistance by the marrow can be negligible when there is little or no volume change, as well as no significant movement between the marrow and the adjacent trabecular bone

FEM under compressive loading

Chen et al. 2015

Annual International Conference Of The IEEE Engineering In Medicine And Biology Society

FEM of trabecular bone

4

Female

Post-menopausal

Human L3 lumbar spine

Trabecular models filled with marrow fat have less maximum stress (3–9%) and larger average stress in volume (9–56%) than that of models with only trabeculae

FEM under compressive loading

Ma et al. 2014

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering In Medicine And Biology Society

FEM of trabecular bone

1

Female

63 years

Human L3 lumbar spine

The trabecular bone with marrow fat suffered larger apparent stress and compressive stress than the model with merely trabecular bone for unconfined compressive tests, i.e., 18.81% for the maximum compressive stress, 10.25% for the average stress

Creep test

Simon et al. 1985

Spine

FEM of trabecular bone

Rhesus monkey L2/L3 lumbar spine

The fluid phase included in the FEMs plays a significant role in the mechanical response of spinal motion segments

Shear test

Mitton et al. 1997

Medical Engineering & Physics

Cylindrical trabecular bone samples

43

Female

9 years (5.6–10.3 years)

Ewe vertebral trabecular bone (L1–L5)

The shear test performed in a bath at 37 ℃ reduced the strength from 32.5 to 37.3% compared with the test in “standard” test conditions. Friction was regarded as a non-negligible factor

Shear properties under torsional loading

Kasra et al. 2007

Journal of Biomechanics

Cylindrical trabecular bone samples

52

Female

6 months and 2 years

Merino sheep lumbar segments (L2–L3)

The presence of bone marrow did not affect trabecular bone shear strength and modulus

  1. 3-D three-dimensional, FEM finite element model