Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of the classifiers for each group and comparison among KNN, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine

From: Identification of arthropathy and myopathy of the temporomandibular syndrome by biomechanical facial features

Groups

Sensitivity (± STD)

Specificity (± STD)

Precision (± STD)

Accuracy (± STD)

KNN

 AG

0.9737 (0.0582)

0.9756 (0.0221)

0.9320 (0.0566)

0.9701 (0.0219)

 MG

0.8703 (0.0793)

0.9897 (0.0142)

0.9676 (0.0425)

0.9599 (0.0221)

 CG

0.9769 (0.0265)

0.9411 (0.0398)

0.9445 (0.0353)

0.9590 (0.0234)

Random forest

 AG

0.6852 (0.0030)

0.8839 (0.0011)

0.6642 (0.0021)

0.8342 (0.0009)

 MG

0.6650 (0.0030)

0.8961 (0.0009)

0.6817 (0.0021)

0.8383 (0.0009)

 CG

0.7900 (0.0018)

0.7951 (0.0018)

0.7947 (0.0014)

0.7926 (0.0011)

Naïve Bayes

 AG

0.7132 (0.0052)

0.8634 (0.0022)

0.6391 (0.0040)

0.8258 (0.0020)

 MG

0.5601 (0.0056)

0.9424 (0.0018)

0.7716 (0.0055)

0.8468 (0.0018)

 CG

0.8411 (0.0029)

0.7691 (0.0033)

0.7864 (0.0024)

0.8051 (0.0020)

Support vector machine

 AG

0.7942 (0.0049)

0.7894 (0.0045)

0.7925 (0.0040)

0.7918 (0.0037)

 MG

0.7894 (0.0045)

0.7942 (0.0049)

0.7963 (0.0042)

0.7918 (0.0037)

 CG

0.8846 (0.0030)

0.7718 (0.0050)

0.7989 (0.0037)

0.8282 (0.0029)

  1. STD standard deviation