Table 5 Similarity of the feature selection techniques
From: Feature ranking and rank aggregation for automatic sleep stage classification: a comparative study
| ReliefF | Fisher | Chi2 | IG | CMIM | MRMR-MID | MRMR-MIQ | Borda | RRA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ReliefF | 1 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Fisher | 1 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.65 | |
| Chi2 | 1 | 0.90 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.52 | 0.52 | ||
| IG | 1 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.46 | |||
| CMIM | 1 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | ||||
| MRMR-MID | 1 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.65 | |||||
| MRMR-MIQ | 1 | 0.72 | 0.65 | ||||||
| Borda | 1 | 0.72 | |||||||
| RRA | 1 |
