Interference between surgical magnetic drapes and pacemakers: an observational study comparing commercially available devices and a new magnetically isolated drape

Table 4 Detailed results for each patient from part 1 of the study

Subject	Date	Age (years)	Gender	Weight (kg)	Height (m)	BMI	Pacemaker model	Asynchronous rhythm with CVD drape	Displacement^a	Asynchronous rhythm with prototype drape (with and without displacement)
1	20/10/2011	82	F	68	1.68	24.02	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
2	20/10/2011	73	M	82	1.78	25.75	Boston Scientific	Yes	Yes	No
3	20/10/2011	81	F	60	1.60	23.44	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
4	20/10/2011	65	M	84	1.73	28.20	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
5	27/10/2011	82	M	66	1.75	21.49	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
6	27/10/2011	52	M	102	1.78	32.19	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
7	27/10/2011	78	F	54	1.63	20.47	Boston Scientific	Yes	Yes	No
8	27/10/2011	75	F	88	1.60	34.38	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
9	27/10/2011	84	F	59	1.60	23.05	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
10	27/10/2011	86	M	77	1.70	26.68	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
11	27/10/2011	82	M	95	1.73	31.84	Boston Scientific	Yes	No	No
12	27/10/2011	81	F	61	1.60	23.91	Boston Scientific	Yes	No	No
13	27/10/2011	70	F	55	1.52	23.81	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
14	27/10/2011	76	M	85	1.74	28.17	Boston Scientific	Yes	Yes	No
15	27/10/2011	76	M	56	1.64	20.82	Boston Scientific	Yes	No	No
16	27/10/2011	80	F	77	1.65	28.17	Boston Scientific	Yes	Yes	No
17	27/10/2011	73	F	102	1.65	37.50	Boston Scientific	No	–	No
18	3/11/2011	81	M	64	1.68	22.50	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
19	3/11/2011	92	M	57	1.70	19.62	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
20	3/11/2011	85	F	69	1.63	25.78	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
21	3/11/2011	75	M	94	1.75	30.79	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
22	3/11/2011	85	M	66	1.65	24.17	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
23	3/11/2011	77	M	93	1.65	34.31	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
24	3/11/2011	76	M	108	1.83	32.25	Medtronic	Yes	No	No
25	3/11/2011	90	M	61	1.68	21.68	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
26	3/11/2011	87	F	45	1.55	18.90	Medtronic	Yes	Yes	No
27	3/11/2011	77	F	93	1.65	34.16	Medtronic	Yes	No	No

ISSN: 1475-925X