Skip to main content

Table 1

From: The design, development, and evaluation of a prototypic, prosthetic venous valve

A Antegrade intra-design variability as indicated by evluation of duplicate prototypes from the FL 2.50 mm design.
  SUBR STBR SUAF STAF
Device Resistance
(mmHg·min/L)
EOA
(cm2)
AE
(mJ)
Resistance
(mmHg·min/L)
EOA
(cm2)
AE
(mJ)
FL 2.50A 0.508 ± 0.041 1.18 ± 0.020 74.6 ± 5.12 0.878 ± 0.065 1.14 ± 0.018 78.3 ± 5.67
FL 2.50B 0.389 ± 0.046* 1.23 ± 0.024* 64.6 ± 5.00* 1.14 ± 0.208* 1.14 ± 0.045 92.1 ± 4.14*
Change 0.119 0.05 10.0 0.262 0.00 13.8
* p < 0.05 versus FL 2.50A
B Retrograde intra-design variability as indicated by evaluation of duplicate prototypes from the FL 2.50 mm design.
  STBR     
Device Regurgitation
(mL)
Percent Reflux
(%)
REL
(mJ)
Energy Retention
(%)
  
FL 2.50A 11.0 ± 0.258 35.8 ± 1.63 9.55 ± 0.078 87.1 ± 1.18   
FL 2.50B 7.82 ± 1.17* 27.6 ± 5.10* 4.95 ± 1.44* 92.2 ± 2.77*   
Change 3.18 8.20 4.60 5.10   
  STAF     
FL 2.50A 2.19 ± 0.536 6.98 ± 1.71 0.400 ± 0.177 99.5 ± 0.227   
FL 2.50B 6.06 ± 1.30* 17.8 ± 3.58* 3.02 ± 1.21* 96.7 ± 1.20*   
Change 3.87 10.8 2.62 2.80   
* p < 0.05 versus FL 2.50A