Table 2 Comparison of RAP between Signals 1 and 2
PatID | N (4-min RAP observations) | RAP (average + std) | Differences in RAP between Signals 1 and 2 (N, %) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Signal 1 | Signal 2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | ||
Category A | ||||||
1 | 685 | 0.45±0.4 | 0.42±0.39 | 315 (46%) | 162 (24%) | 45 (7%) |
2 | 1,040 | 0.37±0.22 | 0.36±0.22 | 105 (10%) | 6 (1%) | 1 |
3 | 414 | 0.83±0.17 | 0.78±0.21 | 52 (13%) | 18 (4%) | 7 (2%) |
4 | 604 | 0.58±0.29 | 0.65±0.28 | 115 (19%) | 23 (4%) | 8 (1%) |
5 | 1,065 | 0.57±0.38 | 0.59±0.36 | 419 (39%) | 206 (19%) | 78 (7%) |
Category B | ||||||
6 | 211 | 0.55±0.39 | −0.74±0.20 | 207 (98%) | 201 (95%) | 190 (90%) |
7 | 1,499 | 0.56±0.35 | 0.11±0.58 | 1,060 (71%) | 838 (56%) | 673 (45%) |
8 | 274 | 0.67±0.37 | 0.28±0.67 | 140 (51%) | 95 (35%) | 70 (26%) |
9 | 191 | 0.09±0.43 | 0.13±0.43 | 130 (68%) | 84 (44%) | 44 (23%) |
10 | 302 | 0.88±0.13 | 0.86±0.14 | 61 (20%) | 17 (6%) | 1 |
Category C | ||||||
11 | 1,834 | 0.62±0.27 | 0.80±0.17 | 844 (46%) | 347 (19%) | 129 (7%) |
12 | 4.777 | 0.15±0.29 | 0.16±0.28 | 2,661 (56%) | 1,135 (24%) | 427 (9%) |
13 | 1,861 | 0.33±0.35 | 0.35±0.32 | 922 (50%) | 345 (19%) | 103 (6%) |
14 | 2,361 | 0.34±0.31 | 0.30±0.35 | 1,259 (53%) | 573 (24%) | 234 (10%) |
15 | 2,022 | 0.50±2.9 | 0.38±0.32 | 923 (46%) | 500 (25%) | 318 (16%) |
16 | 15 | 0.31±0.34 | 0.45±0.40 | 4 (26.7%) | 3 (20%) | 2 (13%) |
17 | 764 | 0.71±0.27 | 0.69±0.34 | 197 (26%) | 99 (13%) | 62 (8%) |
Category D | ||||||
18 | 1,841 | 0.66±0.28 | 0.61±0.31 | 354 (19%) | 114 (6%) | 35 (2%) |
19 | 578 | 0.04±0.36 | 0.06±0.34 | 319 (55%) | 162 (28%) | 87 (15%) |
20 | 718 | 0.65±0.35 | 0.48±0.43 | 339 (47%) | 215 (30%) | 135 (19%) |