Skip to main content

Table 1 Quantitative Comparison on Phantom Image Sequence Segmentation

From: A 3D Freehand Ultrasound System for Multi-view Reconstructions from Sparse 2D Scanning Planes

Sequence

MAD (mm)

Hausdorff Distance (mm)

 

Empirical

parameters

Optimal

parameters

Empirical

parameters

Optimal

parameters

1 (40 frames)

0.9828 (σ = 0.4963)

0.9479 (σ = 0.5209)

3.1076 (σ = 2.0168)

2.8946 (σ = 1.739)

2 (40 frames)

0.6540 (σ = 0.3876)

0.6516 (σ = 0.8613)

1.4230 (σ = 0.8147)

1.4156 (σ = 0.8125)

3 (40 frames)

0.7858 (σ = 0.5158)

0.7523 (σ = 0.2932)

2.7191 (σ = 2.0428)

2.500 (σ = 1.4683)

4 (40 frames)

0.4805 (σ = 0.2927)

0.4802 (σ = 0.2919)

1.1981 (σ = 0.7535)

1.1971 (σ = 0.7504)

5 (44 frames)

0.5105 (σ = 0.2299)

0.5464 (σ = 0.2418)

2.1746 (σ = 1.1174)

1.6694 (σ = 0.8680)

6 (41 frames)

0.4687 (σ = 0.2287)

0.4246 (σ = 0.2044)

1.9629 (σ = 0.9913)

1.0510 (σ = 0.5140)

7 (44 frames)

0.4769 (σ = 0.1677)

0.4815 (σ = 0.1069)

1.8469 (σ = 1.1158)

1.8016 (σ = 0.9674)

8 (47 frames)

0.3849 (σ = 0.1655)

0.5153 (σ = 0.2260)

1.5914 (σ = 0.8436)

1.2425 (σ = 0.5320)

  1. The best results are presented in bold-face.