From: Classification of vasovagal syncope from physiological signals on tilt table testing
Authors | Results (%) | Selected features | Sample size |
---|---|---|---|
1. Ciliberti, M. A. P., et al. 2018 [18] | Sensitivity: 87.5 Specificity: 72.2 PPV: 75.0 NPV: 89.0 | HRV, VLF, LF, HF, LF/HF ratio | 26 (all pos) |
2. M. Kwok et al. 2020 [19] | Sensitivity: 82.6 Specificity: 76.8 Accuracy: 78.9 | HR, CO, SV, TPR, SBP, DBP, HRV, BPV | 128 (46 pos and 82 con) |
3. Carmody et al. 2020 [20] | Sensitivity: 58.8 Specificity: 63.3 Accuracy: 80.2 ROC(AUC):83.2 | SBP-5Â s%, SBP-20Â s%, HR-%I, CO- %I, SV-B2SS | 101 (34 pos, 30 neg and 37 con) |
4. He, Z., et al. 2021 [21] | Sensitivity: 86.0 Specificity: 82.0 ROC(AUC): 94.0 | HR, RRI, SBP, DBP, MBP, LVET, TPR, CO, SV | 203 (128 pos, 75 neg) |
5. S. Hussain et al. 2022 [22] | Sensitivity: 97.6 Specificity: 92.7 Precision: 92.2 F1 score: 94.9 Accuracy: 98.9 ROC(AUC):98.3 | HR, SV, CO, CI, SI, RRI, TPR, TPRI, DBP, MBP, SBP | 687 (96 pos and 591 neg) |
6. Proposed | Sensitivity: 87.0 Specificity: 92.7 Precision: 88.6 F1 score: 87.8 Accuracy: 90.5 ROC(AUC):95.4 | CV_SBPV, CV_DBPV, LFnu_SBPV | 137 (54 pos and 83 neg) |