Table 3 Performance of the classification models for optimal ICL size prediction
Device (s) | Top 3 algorithms | Validation set | Test set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC (95% CI) | AUC (95% CI) | ACC (95% CI) | AUC (95% CI) | ||
UBM | et | 0.834 (0.828 to 0.840) | 0.905 (0.898 to 0.912) | 0.837 (0.830 to 0.843) | 0.906 (0.897 to 0.914) |
rf | |||||
cbt | |||||
Pentacam | et | 0.682 (0.667 to 0.698) | 0.803 (0.789 to 0.817) | 0.682 (0.667 to 0.697) | 0.802 (0.789 to 0.817) |
lgb | |||||
rf | |||||
Sirius | et | 0.701 (0.689 to 0.713) | 0.809 (0.797 to 0.823) | 0.695 (0.682 to 0.708) | 0.808 (0.795 to 0.821) |
cbt | |||||
lgb | |||||
UBM and Pentacam | et | 0.851 (0.842 to 0.859) | 0.908 (0.898 to 0.918) | 0.855 (0.847 to 0.864) | 0.911 (0.901 to 0.921) |
rf | |||||
cbt | |||||
UBM and Sirius | lgb | 0.863 (0.855 to 0.872) | 0.915 (0.903 to 0.927) | 0.862 (0.853 to 0.870) | 0.913 (0.901 to 0.926) |
cbt | |||||
xbt | |||||
Pentacam and Sirius | et | 0.728 (0.714 to 0.742) | 0.816 (0.812 to 0.819) | 0.734 (0.720 to 0.749) | 0.818 (0.814 to 0.821) |
rf | |||||
cbt | |||||
UBM and Pentacam and Sirius | cbt | 0.891 (0.879 to 0.904) | 0.926 (0.913 to 0.939) | 0.895 (0.883 to 0.907) | 0.928 (0.916 to 0.941) |
rf | |||||
lgb | |||||
Only other devices | et | 0.544 (0.530 to 0.558) | 0.636 (0.627 to 0.646) | 0.543 (0.539 to 0.547) | 0.634 (0.630 to 0.638) |
rf | |||||
cbt | |||||