Table 1 Quantitative evaluation of proposed approach in comparison with manual segmentation (gold standard). The average m and deviation σ for three performance measures are calculated for 42 test images and their corresponding gold standards.
From: A coarse-to-fine approach to prostate boundary segmentation in ultrasound images
Number | δ | E A | η |
|---|---|---|---|
m | 3.67 | 5.62 | 98.76 |
σ | 1.08 | 2.98 | 0.68 |