Skip to main content

Implantable antennas for biomedical applications: a systematic review

Abstract

This review presents an in-depth examination of implantable antennas for various biomedical purposes. The development of implantable antennas, including their designs, materials, and operating principles, are introduced at the beginning of the discussion. An overview of the many kinds of implantable antennas utilized in implantable medical devices (IMDs) are presented in this study. The article then discusses the important factors to consider when developing implantable antennas for biomedical purposes, including implant placement, frequency range, and power needs. This investigation additionally examines the challenges and limitations encountered with implantable antennas, including the limited space available within the human body, the requirement for biocompatible materials, the impact of surrounding tissue on antenna performance, tissue attenuation, and signal interference. This review also emphasizes the most recent advances in implanted antenna technology, such as wireless power transmission, multiband operation, and miniaturization. Furthermore, it offers illustrations of several biomedical uses for implantable antennas, including pacemaker, capsule endoscopy, intracranial pressure monitoring, retinal prostheses, and bone implants. This paper concludes with a discussion of the future of implantable antennas and their possible use in bioelectronic medicine and novel medical implants. Overall, this survey offers a thorough analysis of implantable antennas in biomedical applications, emphasizing their importance in the development of implantable medical technology.

Introduction

Implantable antenna technology is a contemporary movement in biomedical applications. The implantation of antennas is used in biomedical diagnosis, therapy, and biotelemetry. Antennas are inserted into the human body for use in electromagnetic wave-based biomedical applications. Gathering patient data and wirelessly communicating it to the base station is the goal of the implanted device within the body area. The trend of implantation started in the 1960s and the first biomedical implantable device was a cardiac pacemaker, to control irregular heart rhythms [1]. The use of an implantable antenna (radiators) for cancer detection, to generate confined bottomless heat for cancer treatment without overheating the surface is important in situations where the implantation of the antennas is applied [2]. Since the population has progressed and public awareness about health has increased, IMDs have become a rising technology. Currently, several drug diffusion systems, implantable defibrillators, and implantable pacemakers are widely used in the biomedical field [3]. Implantable antennas are used to calculate various important parameters of the human body such as continuous glucose monitoring [4], temperature measurements [5], and heart function detection [6].

Implantable antennas are obligatory for wirelessly transmitting data from infix devices to exterior devices. Medical implants are used to identify, diagnose and monitor the medical circumstances of patients. Another major application of the implantable antenna is biotelemetry, and much research progress is working toward medical implants that are accomplished in appropriate frequency bands with minimum interference [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The transmission of the data is carried out in a wireless medium, so security is an important concern when transferring the IMD data [17].

The radio frequency allocation for medical implants varies from region to region according to the regulatory authority. In the United States, frequency band allocation is divided into short-range and long-range bands on the basis of the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) [18,19,20]. In Europe, spectrum allocation is split into active medical implants and associated peripherals and the medical data acquisition range is based on the European Communication Committee (ECC) [20, 21]. Compared with constructing an antenna operating in free space, constructing an antenna in body application is a difficult task [22]. The subsequent frequency bands are used in biotelemetry applications:

  • Medical implant communication services (MICSs): 402–405 MHz [23, 85].

  • Medical device radio communications service (Med Radio): 401–406, 413–419, 426–432, 438–444, and 451–457 MHz [24, 62].

  • Industrial scientific and medical (ISM) band: 433.05–434.79, 902–928, 2400–2483.5, 5725–5850 MHz

  • WMTS bands (608–614 MHz, 1395–1400 MHz, 1427–1432 MHz) [25].

  • Ultra-wide band (UWB): 3100–10600 MHz [26].

  • Medical body area network (MBAN): 2360–2400 MHz [27, 28].

The higher operating frequencies retain narrow wavelengths that lead to a reduction in the dimensions of the antennas. For better data communication, antennas operating at higher frequency ranges with large bandwidths are needed, but they are affected by a greater decrease in the amount of tissue compared with the small frequency ranges [29, 42].

The frequency range from 3 to 5 GHz had 20 to 30 dB attenuation for every 2 cm of physiological material [30]. The communication speed is limited by the lower operating frequencies and the use of large dimensional antennas and bulky circuit elements, which increase the size of the implantable medical device [33].

Figure 1 shows a model of implantable medical devices with biotelemetry. Here some implantable medical devices are appropriately placed on different body parts. From the IMD, the data are collected, accessed via the cloud database, and sent to the concerned persons via a wireless medium.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Model of an implantable medical device with biotelemetry [17]

Significance of implantable antennas

Real-time monitoring. Implantable antennas make it possible to continuously monitor vital signs and physiological parameters, which can lead to early detection of medical conditions and prompt intervention.

Enhanced mobility. With wireless communication enabled by implantable antennas, patients can move around freely without being tethered to monitoring equipment, thereby improving their quality of life.

Minimally invasive care. These antennas reduce the need for frequent doctor visits and invasive tests, making procedures less invasive and more comfortable for patients. Additionally, they minimize the risk of infection.

Remote healthcare and telemedicine. Implantable antennas facilitate telemedicine and remote patient monitoring, making healthcare available to those in remote or underserved areas.

Smart implants. Implantable antennas are essential for smart implants, such as pacemakers, insulin pumps, and neural stimulators, allowing for precise control and fine-tuning of the devices.

Strategies for designing implantable antenna

In contrast to outdated antennas, which operate in free space, implantable antennas, which are anchored in different body parts, must be esthetically acceptable in a variety of situations. The implantable antenna should satisfy the requirements of biocompatibility, miniaturization, patient safety, far-field gain, and low power consumption.

Biocompatibility

The main design consideration of the implantable antenna is biocompatibility to prevent patient safety and avoid radiation to surrounding tissues. Furthermore, because human tissues naturally conduct electricity, human tissue antennas have the ability to make direct contact with the antenna metallization layer, which can cause a short circuit. The anticipation of undesirable short circuits and biocompatibility are more crucial for long-term implantation of the implantable antenna.

Biocompatibility is addressed via two methods: the use of a dielectric superstrate layer and the use of a biocompatible coating. The most commonly used approach is the use of a dielectric superstrate layer to separate the antenna metal radiator from biological tissue and conserve the biocompatibility of the implantable antenna [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Commonly used superstrate materials include Teflon (\({\varepsilon }_{r}=2.1,\text{tan}\delta =0.001)\), MACOR (\({\varepsilon }_{r}=6.1,\text{tan}\delta =0.005)\) and ceramic alumina (\({\varepsilon }_{r}=9.4,\text{tan}\delta =0.006)\) [38,39,40,41]. Another approach is to shield the implantable material with a thin layer of biocompatible materials such as zirconia (\({\varepsilon }_{r}=29,\text{tan}\delta \approx 0)\), PEEK (\({\varepsilon }_{r}=3.2,\text{tan}\delta =0.01),\) and silastic MDX 4210 (\({\varepsilon }_{r}=3.3,\text{tan}\delta \approx 0)\) [37, 42, 43]. Figure 2 shows the two methods of biocompatibility: Fig. 2a shows a biocompatible superstrate and 2b shows a biocompatible coating.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Biocompatible superstrate. b Biocompatible coating

Miniaturization

Miniaturization is one of the most important design considerations for implantable antennas. Recent advanced technologies in antenna fabrication have led to ultra-small implantable antennas. For example, cochlear implants and retinal prostheses are very small and are inserted inside the eyeball and auditory nerves. The geometries of conventional half-wavelength or quarter-wavelength antennas at the wave bands are assigned to the implanted devices, typically the MICS or Med radio bands. In this state, miniaturization is challenging. Some of the miniaturization techniques are listed below.

High-permittivity dielectric substrate/superstrate materials

Utilizing a substrate/superstrate made of a high-permittivity dielectric material is one of the coolest ways to achieve miniaturization because it condenses the effective wavelength and high resonant frequencies are shifted to lower resonant frequencies. A thicker superstrate increases the operating frequency of the implant and larger physical dimensions are required to enhance the resonance [44]. Some highly dielectric materials are listed in Table 1, as mentioned in the literature [45,46,47,48,49].

Table 1 Few of the materials used as substrates and superstrates

Extending the radiator’s current flow path

This method is used to calculate the overall size of the antenna; the longer the radiator's effective current path is, the larger the resonant frequency that could be shifted to a lower resonating frequency. Here, waffle-style, spiral and hook-slotted patches are utilized [48, 49]. In particular, meandering line radiators consist of zigzag or serpentine patterns to elongates the physical path of the radiator within a small footprint [50].

Employing shorting pins

By adding the shorting pin between the patch and ground planes, the necessary physical dimensions are reduced at the appropriate operating frequency. Shorting pins effectively enhance the bandwidth in both regular patches and quarter wave patches [38, 51,52,53,54,55].

Patch staking

By extending the radiator's current flow path, the antenna dimensions decrease when two radiating patches are mounted vertically [54, 55]. A metamaterial-based superstrate is added with antenna structure to enhance the axial ratio, bandwidth and gain [56].

Impedance matching

Impedance matching is achieved by loading methods, with the appropriate capacitance or inductance used to offset the frequency band and direction. Both capacitive and inductive loadings are employed to minimize the antenna size. Furthermore, the split-ring resonator (SRR) can be merged to achieve size reduction and impedance matching [35, 55].

Patient safety

Specific absorption rate (SAR)

Patient safety is measured by the specific absorption rate (SAR—the rate of energy deposited per unit mass of tissue) parameter on the basis of IEEE regulations and guidelines used to prevent patient health [57]. Patient safety is related to the maximum permissible power applied to the implantable antenna. For example, the IEEE c95.1_1999 standard confines the SAR averaged over 1 g of tissue in the shape of a cube to less than 1.6 W/kg (\({SAR}_{1g, max} \le 1.6 W/kg\)) [56]. The ICNIRP elementary limitations are that the SAR averaged over 10 g of connecting tissue is less than 2 W/kg [59]. To correspond with the ICNIRP guidelines, the IEEE C95.1–2005 standard confines the SAR averaged over any 10 g of tissue in the shape of a cube to less than 2 W/kg (\({SAR}_{10g, max} \le 2 W/kg\)) [59, 60].

Temperature limit

Due to an electromagnetic field, the temperature of the body tissue is increased. The temperature of the surrounding tissue of the implantable antenna is not \(1-2\,^\circ{\rm C}\) [35]. In some rectenna and pacemaker type applications, prolonged battery charging and rectifier (wireless power transfer) circuits increased the temperature [61].

Gain in the far-field

Typically, medical implant communication systems (MICSs) consist of an external monitoring device positioned approximately two meters away from the implantable medical device (IMD) and an implantable medical device [62]. Both the recorded vital parameters and the real time monitoring of the body’s vital parameters are transmitted via medical telemetry lines. As a consequence, the external device has to improve the signal strength of the implantable antenna to a satisfactory level. In addition to patient safety, intrusion also restricts the permissible power required for implantable antennas. For example, in the MICS band, the effective radiated power (ERP) of the implantable antenna is restricted to – 16 dBm (25 μW), to avoid nearby service band interference. In addition to effective radiated power, SAR restricts the ability of the gain of the far-field gain to be sensed by the receiver antenna to achieve a consistent biotelemetry link. However, to increase the biotelemetry communication link distance, an implantable antenna with an enhanced gain is needed [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].

Radiation efficiency

Radiation efficiency is a crucial factor for implantable antennas as it measures the antenna's effectiveness in converting input power into radiated electromagnetic energy. However, obtaining high radiation efficiency for implantable antennas is difficult because the surrounding biological tissues tend to absorb and weaken electromagnetic waves. The efficiency of EM energy transfer from dispersive tissues to free space is influenced by several frequency-dependent mechanisms. These include attenuation resulting from dielectric and conductive losses, reflection (mismatch) losses caused by impedance contrast, and physical restrictions on the radiation efficiency of electrically small sources within lossy media. The following methods are used to increase the radiation efficiency while maintaining the compact size of electrically small antennas: bandwidth reduction, and dielectric loading to the antenna structure by using a high-permittivity substrate and a superstrate [75,76,77,78,79].

Low power consumption

The performance of implantable medical devices is limited by power consumption, and there are several approaches for recharging batteries, such as the inductive-loop approach [80,81,82,83]. Nevertheless, biotelemetry links are used to operate only when the necessary data need to be transferred. For this purpose, some transceivers are economically available (Zarlink ZL70101 transceiver) [84]. The transceiver practices two signals one for wake-up, used for transmission, and the other for low power consumption sleep. Until the transceiver obtains a wake-up signal in the 2.45 GHz ISM band, it stays in sleep mode. In regular mode, the system is completely loaded, transmits data in the MICS band, and then switches back to sleep mode after the transmission is finished. When a patient event is recognized or the doctor specifies a schedule, the external controlling device is programmed to automatically wake up the system [22].

Owing to the limitations of battery lifetime and capacity, wireless power transfer (WPT) techniques are applied in medical implants and biomedical sensors and in different biomedical applications such as pacemakers, brain stimulators, capsule endoscopes, and retinal prostheses. Wireless power transfer offers a safe and simple solution that eliminates power capacity barriers and lessens the challenges involved with surgical battery replacement. Recently many biomedical implants, including capsule endoscopes [85], heart rate sensors [86], brain simulators [87], and left ventricular assist devices [88] have been used for WPT.

On the basis of electromagnetic fields, the WPT technique can be categorized into a near-field region or nonradiative region and a far-field or radiative region [89]. The differences between radiative and nonradiative WPT are the coverage distance and operating frequency [90]. Figure 3 shows the classification of the WPT techniques. For nonradiative transmission, the transmission distance ranges from millimeters to several meters. Radiative transmission covers a large area of nearly several kilometers [91]. Nonradiative WPT can be subcategorized into various types: magnetic resonant coupling (MRC), inductive coupling (IC), capacitive coupling (CC), and magneto dynamic coupling (MDC). Far-field WPT transmission involves laser and microwave power transfer and can be transferred over hundreds of meters [92,93,94,95].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Categorization of wireless power transmission methods

Review of implantable antennas for leadless pacemakers

Currently, arrhythmia-related cardiac dysfunction affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide. To encourage healthy aging and reduce the number of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related premature deaths, affordable healthcare services are necessary. In addition, remote monitoring is used to minimize face-to-face interactions between patients, healthcare professionals, and doctors and it also lowers exposure to a variety of infections. The commercially available pacemakers are the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (Medtronic) and the Nanostim Leadless Pacemaker (Abbott). Figure 4 shows an overview of the architecture of leadless pacemaker and its components.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Overview of leadless pacemaker

Conventional pacemaker (CP) versus leadless pacemaker (LP)

Pacemakers are medical devices that assist patients in controlling their heartbeat in the event of arrhythmias or other cardiac conditions. Leadless pacemakers and conventional pacemakers are the two primary types of pacemakers. The conventional pacemakers consist of pulse generator (battery with electric circuitry) and leads. The CP requires a surgical incision to place the device within the heart chambers. However, it has many complications such as infections, lead misplacement, lead to damage and need regular maintenance as well as battery replacement. The leadless pacemakers are very small in size, can be anchored to the heart chamber with tiny tines and are minimally invasive. The LP is lead free so it eliminates the risk of infection, fracture or lead displacement. However, LPs have some limitations such as single chamber pacing and battery life.

Design challenges

Research on deeply implantable antennas designed for leadless pacemakers is limited due to the challenges of creating such antennas in the confined space available, while also accounting for the loss of signal caused by human tissues and the surrounding electronic modules. Pacemakers have a limited battery life, so the design of the antenna must be power-efficient to prolong the device’s operational life. Additionally, some designs incorporate energy harvesting techniques that require an efficient antenna design to capture and convert energy from external sources. The impedance of human tissue can also affect the impedance of the antenna, necessitating careful matching to ensure minimal reflection and maximum power transfer. Achieving a wideband impedance match can improve signal quality and reliability.

The two main types of leadless pacemaker antenna designs are conformal and flat. Specifically, flat antennas must be mounted on top of the biotelemetry module, which is housed inside the pacemaker capsule, or on the PCB holder. In contrast, conformal antennas must be encircled by the curved surface of the pacemaker capsule. Recent research has demonstrated the miniaturization, wideband characteristics and wireless power transfer techniques.

Various approaches employed in the literature

The spiral-shaped antennas are used to downsize the implantable antenna footprints, as well as to improve the multiband characteristics for leadless pacemakers with biotelemetry applications at the MICS, ISM and midfield frequency bands. A miniaturized volume of \(17.15 {mm}^{3}\) was achieved by using the high dielectric substrate/superstrate, spiral-shaped radiator with two symmetrical arms and open-end slots in the ground [96]. An ultra-compact implantable antenna with a volume of \(4. 5 {mm}^{3}\) was achieved with a folded meander line radiator, a defective ground structure and a high dielectric substrate for wireless cardiac pacemaker application in the ISM band. A ceramic aluminum oxide film was used to coat the whole system, to maintain biocompatibility [97]. To enhance the reliability and effective telemetry link between the pacemaker and external devices the circular polarization technique is used in the pacemaker. The asymmetrical U-shaped meander line radiator with different slots in the ground without any shorting pin was used to obtain the circular polarization and \(7.7 {mm}^{3}\) antenna footprint at the 915 MHz ISM band for pacemaker applications [98].

The ultra-wideband characteristics enable high data rate transmission between the pacemaker and external device and prevent detuning. The reported antenna has a compact size of \(9.44 {mm}^{3}\) and is validated with a homogeneous heart phantom for covering the WMTS, midfield and ISM band frequencies to obtain a 3380 MHz ultra-wide bandwidth. The large rectangular slot in the radiator and the insertion of a meandering line in the ground plane are used for miniaturization and ultra-wideband characteristics [99]. The large circular, semicircular slots in the radiator and meander line in the ground are used to achieve the ultra-wide bandwidth of 3040 MHz and a miniaturized volume of \(10.66 {mm}^{3}\) and it cover three different ISM band, midfield and WMTS frequency bands [100]. Figure 5 shows the flat and conformal types of antennas used in the literature.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Flat type meander line antenna [97]. b Conformal type loop antenna [101]

The circularly polarized loop antenna inspired by the Hilbert curve was reported in [101]. A high dielectric constant substrate/superstrate and fractal geometry were used to attain a small footprint of \(9.1 {mm}^{3}\) at the WMTS and ISM frequency bands. The designed antenna features a conformal shape that perfectly fits within the leadless pacemaker’s capsule, and is enclosed by dummy electronic components. Afterward, the integrated prototype is simulated deeply within the center of the multilayer realistic heart model. Recently, the multiple input multiple output (MIMO) implantable antennas have been developed to increase the spectral efficiency and data rate in pacemaker applications. Compared to single antenna systems MIMO communication systems provide high capacity and low-loss transmission/reception without the need for additional power. The dual-band circularly polarized triple band MIMO antenna was presented in [102]. By utilizing ring slots, rectangular slits, shorting pins, and a meandering structure, the developed antenna is able to reach compact dimensions of \(32.3 {mm}^{3}\) and accomplish CP properties at the WMTS, ISM and midfield frequency bands. The Hilbert curve-based fractal MIMO antenna was presented in [103], in which the fractals are used to improve the current path acquire the multiband characteristics and downsize the antenna geometry to \(5.69 {mm}^{3}\). Leadless pacing devices are equipped with an ultra-compact MIMO antenna that allows low-loss MIMO transmission to an external MIMO antenna for remote cardiac monitoring on a 5G IoT platform.

Pacemakers and other implanted medical devices face significant challenges in terms of is battery lifetime. To extend its service life, which could result in patients requiring additional surgery, the battery must be changed. It is necessary to create an implantable antenna that can transmit power and facilitate communication to prolong battery life and reduce the risk of the patient’s life. The emergence of wireless power transfer (WPT) technology offers potential remedies for this issue. The split resonant ring-based implantable antenna is used to obtain the ultra-wideband characteristics has a footprint of \(91.44 {mm}^{3}\) at the ISM band [104]. The silicone head is used for the biocompatibility purposes. Furthermore, a novel wireless power transfer (WPT) system is developed by including a tiny metasurface to improve WPT efficiency and prolong the lifespan of implantable devices. The loop-based patch and meander line in the ground are used to attain the minuscule dimensions of \(10.6 {mm}^{3}\) and ultra-wide bandwidth. The proposed antenna was merged with a multisection rectifier with wideband capabilities to convert the received radio frequency (RF) energy into direct current (DC). The rectifier’s RF-dc conversion efficiency has been increased by the use of spatial power combining techniques [105]. These methods involve the independent generation of two signal components, 1.5 and 1.52 GHz, which are then transmitted via an ultra-wideband horn antenna. Table 2 lists the various types of antennas and their parameters used in previous studies.

Table 2 Implantable antenna for leadless pacemakers

Review of implantable antennas for capsule endoscopy

The capsule endoscopy system is a noninvasive method which a tiny, ingestible capsule embedded with a wireless transceiver system and camera used to obtain images of gastrointestinal tracks for disease diagnosis.

Conventional endoscopy versus capsule endoscopy

Conventional endoscopy is ideal for therapeutic interventions and high-resolution visualization of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. Although it is intrusive and anesthesia is necessary, it provides direct control and the opportunity to provide therapies as necessary. For a thorough, noninvasive evaluation of the small intestine and entire GI tract, wireless capsule endoscopy is the best opportunity. Although it is safer and more pleasant for patients, its usage is restricted to diagnosis and does not have any therapeutic potential.

Design challenges

To determine this parameter the capsule antenna should be small in size and should be able to move through various body parts. Within the capsule’s constrained space, the antenna must perfectly harmonize with other parts including the camera, battery, and transmitter. For high data transmission rates, ultra-wideband capsule antennas are needed. For extended periods of time in contact with human tissues, the antenna materials must be safe and biocompatible. Avoiding any harmful or reactive materials is part of this. It is necessary to encase the antenna and other electronic components in a biocompatible material that shields them from physiological fluids while enabling signal transmission. There is a slight chance that the capsule will become lodged in a constricted or narrowed section of the GI system and need to be surgically removed. Therefore, the antenna for capsule endoscopy requires a small size, wide bandwidth, and omnidirectional radiation pattern to achieve successful data transmission from the capsule endoscope to the digestive system. Figure 6 shows the detailed operation of wireless capsule endoscopy.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Overview of the capsule endoscopy system

Various approaches employed in the literature

A flexible magnetic-based spiral antenna (\(\pi \times {(8)}^{2}\times 26 {mm}^{3}\)) with a conformal structure and a dielectric-based meandering line antenna (\(\pi \times {(6)}^{2}\times 0.64 {mm}^{3}\)) with a planar structure were proposed for use in body applications [106]. Similarly, on-body applications for MICS band spiral antennas (\(20 \times 6.8\times 1.27 {mm}^{3}\)) and ISM band meander line (\(42 \times 10\times 1.6 {mm}^{3}\)) were also designed. Both the spiral structure and meander line are used for miniaturization. To decrease the multipath interference and increase the bit error rate circularly polarized antennas are proposed. A dual-band circularly polarized and ultra-miniaturized antenna was presented [107]. The circular polarization and miniaturization are obtained by the meander line structure combined with slots and a defective ground structure without any vias provides the smallest footprint of \(2.11 {mm}^{3}\) in the MICS and ISM bands. The proposed structure is formed like a capsule with a copper cylinder and copper strips used to enclose the capsule to provide more space to other components [108]. The omnidirectional and wide bandwidth was achieved with the help of copper strips. The polyimide shell was used to encapsulate the antenna system to provide biocompatibility and reduce the electromagnetic interference produced by the surrounding tissues. The dimensions of the proposed cylindrical structure are \(20\times 11\times 0.07 {mm}^{3}\) operates for the WMTS and ISM bands.

An ultra-thin and ultra-miniaturized antenna was introduced in [109] in the ISM band for deep tissue applications such as capsule endoscopy. Miniaturization was achieved by placing slots in the radiator and ground as well as the thin substrate/superstrate material Rogers ULTRALAM with 0.2 mm thickness, and the volume of the proposed antenna was \(7.8 {mm}^{3}\). The dual band feature is an important aspect of an implantable antenna. This feature enables simultaneous data transmission and power transfer at two distinct frequency bands. The dual band and miniaturized volume of \(42.69 {mm}^{3}\) were presented in [110]. The dual band and miniaturization were acquired by using the shorting pin, open-ended slots, semicircular slots and middle slot in the patch. A biotelemetry link was created to validate reliable transmission. The presented implantable antenna can be used in conformal or planar forms [111]. To make the conformal structure the antenna was mounted in the outer wall of the capsule. The meander line structure was used to achieve a miniaturized volume of \(2.5 {mm}^{3}\), and 0.2 mm thickness of polyethylene material was used for biocompatibility. The conformal dual polarized ultra-wideband antenna was designed in [112] for wireless capsule endoscopy applications. The dual polarization was attained by irregular rectangular loop, with a step shaped monopole, these two loops are separately printed on top and bottom of the dielectric substrate. The slot-based patch conformal antenna was embedded into the \(17.7\times 8.9 mm^{2}\) capsule encircled with flexible polyimide material for tissue independent ingestible and implantable capsule applications in Med radio band [113]. The proposed antenna achieves the ultra-robust impedance characteristics. The conformal low-profile microstrip antenna was introduced for ingestible and implantable capsule endoscopy as well as animal biotelemetry applications. The hybrid numerical analytical approach was used for a miniaturized size of \(7 mm\times 17 mm \times 50 \mu m\) at 433 MHz [114].

MIMO implantable antenna for capsule endoscopy

For capsule endoscopy applications, MIMO antennas provide several benefits over single-element antennas, including expanded coverage, higher data rates, better signal quality, multiplexing of spatial signal features without any additional power, and interference resilience, improving diagnostic capabilities. But the major limitation of MIMO antenna with small geometry is isolation. The proposed conformal two-port MIMO antenna with meandered loop structure has a footprint of \(5.928 {mm}^{3}\), and it covers MICS, WMTS and ISM band of frequencies [115]. The proposed wireless capsule endoscopy consists of MIMO antenna, two camera modules, batteries, LED and PCB with dummy electronics. The polyimide material is used for biocompatibility purpose and transparent mica is used for encapsulate the capsule lid to enhance the image quality. The low-profile MIMO covers MICS and ISM band for capsule endoscopy and scalp implantation. The miniaturized dimensions of \(13.03 {mm}^{3}\), was achieved by using shorting pins, rectangular and arc shape slots on the patch and open-ended slots in the ground [116]. The capsule was validated on both planar and conformal form. To verify the effective communication link budget analysis was made.

The miniscule, high data rate and two element MIMO antenna was presented [117] for capsule endoscopy application at ISM band. The miniaturized size of \(2.52 {mm}^{3}\) was achieved by using high-permittivity substrate, defective ground and meandered loop radiator. The slots and I shape stubs are used to provide high isolation between elements. The four-port MIMO antenna was projected in [118] for wireless endoscopy application at ISM band. The MIMO antenna contains four probe fed meandered loop with common ground plane with 0.5 mm edge to edge separation has a dimension of \(4.09 {mm}^{3}\). The compact two-port dual-band implantable antenna was proposed in [119]. The compactness of \(15.3 {mm}^{3}\) was achieved by using the meandering slots and ground plane slots without shorting pin. Additionally, no mutual coupling reduction strategy was used to improve port isolation. Rather, the meandering lines were purposefully crafted to offset the field effects that impede currents flowing in opposite directions on nearby lines within the radiating patch, which transpire at both resonances. The novel approach of SISO water-based implantable antenna (WBIA), which can be quickly transformed into a MIMO antenna for implantable device [120]. Because of the water's extremely high permittivity, the WBIAs’ size was greatly decreased. The volume of \(315 {mm}^{3}\) MIMO antenna downsizing is possible with high-permittivity water, the capacitive effect of radiator and water-based ground plane at ISM band. Table 3 lists various antennas used for the capsule endoscopy application in literature.

Table 3 Implantable antenna for capsule endoscopy

Review of implantable antennas for intracranial pressure monitoring

It is difficult to use clinical measurements of intracranial pressure (ICP) to predict head wounds and ailments of the brain and stroke to prevent death and disability.

Traditional methods versus implantable antennas for intracranial pressure monitoring

The intraventricular catheter (ventriculostomy), subdural/epidural/parenchymal sensors, methods are used to measure intracranial pressure through invasive methods, and transcranial Doppler, and magnetic resonance (MR) methods are used to measure the ICP by imaging methods. In the above methods the catheter needs to be inserted into the brain nerves and the cerebrospinal fluid value needs to be read via wired methods. Using the implantable antenna, a wireless sensor system implanted in the cranial cavity measures the ICP and transmits data to an external receiver via an implantable antenna. While traditional methods of ICP monitoring are highly accurate and widely used, they have significant risks and limitations, particularly with respect to invasiveness and patient comfort. Implantable antennas offer a promising alternative, providing minimally invasive, continuous, and wireless monitoring. However, they also present new challenges, particularly in terms of miniaturization, biocompatibility, signal transmission from complex brain environments and power management.

Design challenges

The in-body antenna design was complicated because of the unpredictable nature of human tissue and organs, and it absorbs most of the antenna radiation. The important considerations when designing implantable antennas for ICP monitoring are their wide bandwidth, broad radiation pattern, biocompatibility and good signal transmission capability.

Various approaches employed in the literature

Previously ICP measurements under megahertz frequencies required large inductive links, after which they were moved in terms of microwave frequencies with the help of a piezoresistive sensor, oscillator, and chip antenna [121]. The planar inverted F antenna was used to monitor the ICP in the ISM band and monitoring with a scalp phantom matching the implant environment was implemented to estimate the operating time, frequency, emitted temperature, and radiation of the antenna to imitate its physiological surroundings [40].

Figure 7 shows the block diagram of an intracranial pressure monitoring system; it has an implantable antenna that is used to measure the intracranial pressure and then the vital body parameter is processed by a signal processing unit after it is transmitted through the wireless medium. The receiver unit consists of a signal conversion unit, analysis unit, and data logging unit and finally, it is interfaced with a network for biotelemetry purposes.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Block diagram of the wireless intracranial pressure monitoring system

The employment of a tiny (\(6 \times 5 mm^{2}\)) coplanar implant antenna with a sensor stage to transmit the recorded intracranial pressure to the skull and generate a link budget to transport the data in the 0.5–1 m range is part of the minimally invasive intracranial pressure monitoring technique [122]. The intracranial pressure is monitored at 2.45 GHz via annular slot antennas, which have a better radiating efficiency than previously utilized strip antennas, such as the printed inverted F antenna. The performance deviation can be controlled by the shielding layer to the outer wall of the cable in a vector network analyzer test and an appropriate grounding technique is used for the cable exterior conductor and the inner feed point [123]. On the basis of the temperature distribution the ICP is also monitored with a dual-band implantable antenna. The spherical shape human head model is used for numerical analysis. A temperature range from \(0.5-2.7^\circ{\rm C}\) is generated close to the implantable antenna on the basis of the IEEE basic exposure limitations [124]. The loop antennas are used for wireless ICP monitoring. In this loop, the antenna can penetrate a maximum distance of 19 mm to the skin which is 8 mm greater than that in earlier models, and it initiates penetration of the implant 11 mm into the skin [125].

An ultra-miniaturized dual-band implantable antenna system was developed and the projected system was integrated with microelectronic elements, batteries, and a supple implantable antenna. Link budget calculations are used to verify the wireless communication ability and establish the transmission range from human tissue to the outside world. Ultra-miniaturization is also achieved by using a spiral radiator, a shorting pin, and a ground plane with several slots. The current path is extended by using spiral geometry and shorting pins. The gain is increased by using the slots in the ground plane and moving the resonance frequency to lower bands. The superstrate acts as an insulating layer, to prevent radiation from occurring in the outside environment [126,127,128,129]. To reduce the design complexity, some implantable antennas are made with a slot less and via less ground planes. The biotelemetry link is tested with link margin calculations and the communication link can be launched at a distance of 4.5 m [130].

The vertical end-fire antenna with a Vivaldi shape operates at 3–5 GHz for high-speed air communication to the brain–machine cooperative application. To prevent radiation distortion and avoid gain loss due to the lossy tissue environment, the designed Vivaldi antenna is rooted vertically at the altitude of the skull. Miniaturization is achieved by using slot arrays which are also used to increase the gain and bandwidth [131]. Deionized water with high permittivity is utilized as an insulator to accomplish miniaturization and deionized water-based padding is employed to separate the antenna to improve wideband properties and impedance matching. To achieve the broadside frequency response, the proposed antenna consists of a tapering treaded microstrip feed line and an enhanced rectangular slit etched on the ground plane [132]. The dual-band four-port self-quadruplexing implantable antenna was introduced for scalp implantable applications [133]. A miniaturized size of \(22.62 {mm}^{3}\) was achieved by using semicircular slots, a semicircular meandered radiator and high dielectric substrates at three ISM bands and WMTS band. Furthermore, three SDRs are used to verify this antenna's simultaneous transmit and receive (STAR) capability.

In Table 4, the implantable antennas designed by different investigators for intracranial pressure monitoring are consolidated. It contains the antenna type, operating frequency, and antenna parameters. Mostly the meandered line structure and patch antennas are used at the WMTS, and ISM, and some ultra-wide bands are also used for intracranial pressure monitoring applications. Typically, high dielectric constant substrates are used to achieve miniaturization and improve the gain and overall implantable antenna performance.

Table 4 Implantable antennas for intracranial pressure monitoring

Review of implantable antennas for retinal prostheses

Retinal prostheses are reconstructive devices used for limited visualization in blind people suffering from retina pigmentosa (RP) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), where some percentages of the retinal film is depreciated triggering impaired vision. This section elaborates on some of the retinal prosthesis implantable antennas designed by researchers.

Design challenges

Miniaturization of retinal prosthesis implants is challenging because the designed implant needs to fit in the intraocular region to activate the intact posterior visual pathway. Similarly, biocompatibility is another criterion. Additionally, heat generation around biological tissues needs to be maintained at minimum levels.

Various approaches employed in the literature

The intraocular element in a retinal prosthesis is designed by using the compact planar meander line dipole. This confirmed that the meander dipole can perform better than a traditional microstrip patch antenna for a retinal prosthesis [134]. The 2D and 3D pleated dipole antennas are cast off for the bioinformation telemetry link to the retinal prosthesis. While two-dimensional models have a smaller planar footprint than three-dimensional models, three-dimensional models nevertheless have better antenna properties such as gain and bandwidth [135]. A microstrip patch antenna with an RF MEMS capacitor was incorporated at microwave frequencies for both intraocular and extraocular applications. To achieve the desired resonant frequency RF capacitors are placed on the microstrip stubs. Nevertheless, the main limitation of this system is that the antenna is filled with a radial stub, so many capacitors are not loaded with stubs [136].

The microstrip-based PIFA antenna in the MICS band is suitable for increasing radiation efficiency in the inner eyeball [137]. The miniaturized circularly polarized and conformal microstrip patch antenna was designed at 2.4–2.48 GHz for retinal prosthesis application and data transfer from the prosthesis to the exterior world. Specific absorption rate distributions in the inner head phantom model at the MICS band (402–405 MHz) and two ISM band (902–928 MHz and 2.4–2.48 GHz). The MICS band and ISM band (902–928 MHz) SAR values are acceptable for the retinal prostheses, but for the 2.4–2.48 GHz band the SAR value is greater and losses are also greater than the remaining two frequency bands [138]. Modified Hilbert transform and serpentine geometries are used to achieve miniaturization and circular polarization. Both the substrate and the superstrate are made up of polydimethylsiloxane for better gain and biocompatibility [139].

The biocompatible microstrip patch antenna employed for retinal prosthesis application in the Med radio frequency band. The antenna is implemented with three dissimilar biocompatible materials namely a Silastic MDX4-4210 medical-grade elastomer, zirconia, and PEEK, and the performance is analyzed. The desired antenna tuning properties are achieved via an automated quasi-Newton method [140]. Triangularly shaped microstrip patch antennas for intraocular and planar inverted F-antennas have been investigated for extraocular purposes at 1.45 and 2.45 GHz [141]. Wire patch antennas were also used at the ISM and UWB bands for retinal prosthesis applications on the basis of Hansen and Collin’s physical boundaries. The antenna performance is evaluated exclusively by diverse eye specter counting with an eye specter examination model established similarly to that used for prototypical SMCM eyes [142]. The proposed compact rectenna system consists of a rectifier and an implantable receiver antenna and transmitter at 915 and 2450 MHz. The presented antenna is shaped by adding a semicircular ring-loaded rectangular stub and two open-ended circular annular rings to a traditional circular patch. To obtain the desired frequency bands, a shorting pin is also utilized at the patch edge. Additionally, the circular ground plane is altered by creating symmetrical slots across the four quadrants and edges to make the structure electrically compact and fit extremely dense electrodes. The volume of the proposed antenna is \(0.35 {mm}^{3}\) at triple frequencies of 1.25 GHz, 2.45 GHz and 3.32 GHz [143]. Table 5 shows a few of the implantable antennas used for retinal prosthesis applications. In retinal prosthesis applications mostly microstrip patch antennas are used at Med radio and ISM band frequencies.

Table 5 Implantable antennas for retinal prostheses

Review of implantable antennas for bone implants

Bone is a very important part of the body; it provides mechanical support to tissues and organs and is also used to store minerals. Osteoporosis occurs due to a deficiency of vitamin D, which leads to bone brittleness and bone cracks. An accident is also typically the basis of cracks or defects in the bones. Bone implants refer to artificial devices made of materials such as titanium, stainless steel, or ceramic that are surgically placed into bones to replace missing or damaged sections. They can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including fractures, osteoporosis, and joint replacements. The goal of bone implants is to restore the structure and function of the affected bones and to promote healing and recovery.

Traditional monitoring versus implantable antenna for bone fracture monitoring

X-ray, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and physical examination methods are used to identify bone fractures. The traditional methods involve radiation exposure and only a limited area is covered. The physical examination provides functional information, but lacks interior visualization. Real-time monitoring and early detection are possible using the implantable antenna.

Design challenges

The bone implant dielectric material should be biocompatible and durable. The attenuation must be reduced and the signal transmission must be increased. The bone implant size should be too small be fixed within the minimum space. Therefore, the cutting-edge antenna is designed to maximize performance in the body's intricate environment.

Various approaches employed in the literature

The flexible loop antenna was cast off at the MICS and ISM bands for biomedical bone implant applications. The magnetic type antennas provide improved attainment inside the human body which is nonmagnetic, so loop-type structures are used. The meander-type radiators are used to provide a larger current path to shift the resonant frequency and provide the anticipated Med radio frequency band [144].

Figure 8 is a schematic of the use of a microwave system for bone strength analysis. The microwave signal is generated by the source and amplified via the power amplifier. It is passed through the transmitter antenna and bone part under test and received by the receiver antenna. After that, it is applied to the low-noise amplifier to remove the noise. Finally, it is applied to the processor to access the output

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic architecture of the microwave system for bone health analysis

Furthermore, an antenna structure containing dual monopoles and a metallic plate was used to monitor the healing of the bone fracture. The magnitude of S21 describes the fracture between the bones that are restored progressively by changing from the blood to the bone marrow and bone cortex [145]. The developed spiral-type loop antenna, is placed on the tibial bone. The aperture-type structure is modeled between the two complementary spiral layers to achieve end-fire single-sided radiation [146]. The UHF antennas are required to noninvasively monitor bone fracture at 860–960 MHz. The two matching antennas are located on the front and back adjacent to the fractured bones and based on the S—parameters difference the position of the crack can be identified [147]. Helically shaped implantable antennas are used to detect bone fractures without any contact with the bone. The fracture bone characteristics are examined through changes in the dimensions of the biological material. When the fracture width changes the dielectric properties of the antenna also change, so the fracture location can be easily identified [148].

A dual UWB stubbed monopole antenna is designed to record bone mineral density in a noninvasive manner at 3–7 GHz. Osteoporosis can be characterized by bone mineral density. A microstrip line, a modified ground plane, and a circular radiating route with a slot make up the design of a rounded stubbed monopole antenna. The ground plane is square, and on top of it, a square stub is combined to increase the bandwidth [149]. For bone implants at the 402–406 MHz Med radio band and 433–434 MHz ISM band, a patch antenna with spiral split rings is utilized with a biotelemetry link at a 12-m distance indoors. The antenna model was verified in both adult and child legs [150]. At 2.45 GHz, a small narrowband monopole antenna is used for primary-level bone crack diagnostics. The antenna design consists of a rectangular ground plane and an enhanced hexagon-shaped radiator with six integrated triangle slits on the bottom edge. The antenna simulation results are validated with pig bones and tissues [151].

The proposed method involves implanting a half-wave dipole antenna with a length of 116 mm in the fractured arm and measuring the transmitted power and reflection coefficient at the antenna's far-field exterior of the body at 402 MHz [152]. An additional layer is added to the humerus to mimic fracture, which causes a rise in the loss of the electromagnetic field in human tissue and a subsequent decrease in the transmitted power. When fractures occur, the average transmitted power density (APDs) varies from 11.54 to 15.75% depending on the fracture type. Additionally, the reflection coefficients increased from − 22.35 dB to − 22.65 dB compared with those of normal bone, indicating a change in the bone healing status. A conformal printed antenna that is deeply implanted at 2.45 GHz is shown. A coaxial-cable-fed trapezoidal radiator that is intended to transmit biological signals gathered by appropriate biosensors within the body using the hip implant as its ground plane. The system, which included a conformal radiator, a biocompatible gypsum-based dielectric, and a metallic (or comparable) hip implant, was evaluated by submerging the 3D-printed plastic bone in the tissue-like liquid that was kept in a plastic bucket [153]. A trapezoidal radiator and truncated ground plane were used to monitor bone fractures in ISM band [154]. The proposed antenna has compact dimensions of \(25 mm\times 25 mm\times 0.25 mm\) and uses a Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 substrate. A Vivaldi antenna with standard (\(20\times 30\times 1.57\)) and miniaturized (\(10\times 5\times 1.57\)) dimensions was proposed at 1.5 GHz [155] to monitor the bone healing status. Vivaldi type antennas are generally used to provide cross polarization, broadband characteristics, effective radiation patterns, simple feeding methods and ease of fabrication. Table 6 lists some of the antennas that are used in bone implants. Figure 9 shows the implantable antenna used in the literature for bone implant applications.

Table 6 Implantable antennas for bone implants
Fig. 9
figure 9

Implantable antenna for orthopedic applications: a top view, b bottom view [155]

Necessity for ongoing research in implantable antennas

The implantable antennas are tiny, resilient communicators embedded inside the human phantom. The following are the essential criteria for unending research on implantable antennas:

  • To uncover new materials and coatings that can enhance biocompatibility and minimize the chances of rejection or infection.

  • To improve signal strength and dependability within the intricate and variable human body.

  • Efficient methods for harvesting energy and wirelessly transmitting it must be developed to ensure the longevity of implantable devices without the need for frequent battery replacements.

  • Ensuring the security and privacy of transmitted data is essential as implantable devices become more interconnected to safeguard patient information.

  • The integration of implantable antennas with other emerging technologies, such as bioelectronics and nanotechnology, can lead to the development of more sophisticated and versatile medical devices.

  • Customizable antennas tailored to individual patient needs and specific medical conditions must be developed to increase the effectiveness of implantable medical devices.

Conclusion

A review of recent studies has demonstrated that implantable antennas have many possibilities for application across an array of biomedical applications. Real-time data collection and monitoring are made possible by these antennas' ability to provide wireless connections between external monitoring systems and implantable medical devices. Implantable antenna design must consider a number of complications, such as size, efficiency, and biocompatibility. With differing degrees of effectiveness, several antenna types, including patches, helices, meandering line structures, dipoles, and fractal geometries, have been proposed and studied for implantable applications. Implantable antennas have a great impact in medical field, still there are several obstacles to overcome, such as problems with power transfer and frequency distribution. Furthermore, safety issues need to be addressed, especially in light of the possibility of tissue heating and interaction with other electronic equipments. To better understand the potential impact of implantable antennas on human health and to enhance their design and functionality, more research is necessary. In summary, implantable antenna research holds great promise for improving medical monitoring and treatment, making it an intriguing field of study. Although great progress has been made in this field, further study is still needed to solve current issues and ensure both the safety and efficacy of these devices in healthcare environments.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Greatbatch W, Holmes CF. History of implantable devices. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1991;10(3):38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Durney CH, Iskander MF. Antennas for medical applications. In: Lo YT, Lee SW, editors. Antenna handbook. Boston: Springer; 1993. p. 596–654.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Wessels D. Implantable pacemakers and defibrillators: device overview & EMI considerations. In 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE. 2002;2:911–5.

  4. Yilmaz T, Karacolak T, Topsakal E. Characterization and testing of a skin mimicking material for implantable antennas operating at ISM band (2.4 GHz-2.48 GHz). IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2008;7:418–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scanlon WG, Evans NE, McCreesh ZM. RF performance of a 418-MHz radio telemeter packaged for human vaginal placement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(5):427–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow EY, Ouyang Y, Beier B, Chappell WJ, Irazoqui PP. Evaluation of cardiovascular stents as antennas for implantable wireless applications. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Techn. 2009;57(10):2523–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scarpello ML, Kurup D, Rogier H, Ginste DV, Axisa F, Vanfleteren J, Joseph W, Martens L, Vermeeren G. Design of an implantable slot dipole conformal flexible antenna for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2011;59(10):3556–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asili M, Green R, Seran S, Topsakal E. A small implantable antenna for MedRadio and ISM bands. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2012;11:1683–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alrawashdeh R, Huang Y, Cao P. Flexible meandered loop antenna for implants in MedRadio and ISM bands. Electron Lett. 2013;49(24):1515–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asili M, Chen P, Hood AZ, Purser A, Hulsey R, Johnson L, Ganesan AV, Demirci U, Topsakal E. Flexible microwave antenna applicator for chemo-thermotherapy of the breast. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2015;16(14):1778–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahramiabarghouei H, Porter E, Santorelli A, Gosselin B, Popović M, Rusch LA. Flexible 16 antenna array for microwave breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(10):2516–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang S, Liu P, Yang M, Wang Q, Song J, Dong L. From flexible and stretchable meta-atom to metamaterial: a wearable microwave meta-skin with tunable frequency selective and cloaking effects. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):21921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herth E, Guerchouche K, Rousseau L, Calvet LE, Loyez C. A biocompatible and flexible polyimide for wireless sensors. Microsyst Technol. 2017;23:5921–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aleef TA, Hagos YB, Minh VH, Khawaldeh S, Pervaiz U. Design and simulation-based performance evaluation of a miniaturised implantable antenna for biomedical applications. Micro Nano Lett. 2017;12(10):821–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Emami-Nejad H, Mir A. Design and simulation of a flexible and ultra-sensitive biosensor based on frequency selective surface in the microwave range. Opt Quant Electron. 2017;49:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blauert J, Kiourti A. Dual-Band (2.4/4.8 GHz) implantable antenna for biomedical telemetry applications. In 2018 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES). IEEE. 2018; pp. 1–2.

  17. Challa S, Wazid M, Das AK, Khan MK. Authentication protocols for implantable medical devices: taxonomy, analysis and future directions. IEEE Consum Electron Mag. 2017;7(1):57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conran, C.P. Antenna Designs for Wireless Medical Implants. Master’s Thesis, Technological University of Dublin, Ireland, September 2013.

  19. Fish & Richardson. Wireless medical technologies: navigating government regulation in the new medical age. Boston: Fish & Richardson; 2017. p. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soliman MM, Chowdhury ME, Khandakar A, Islam MT, Qiblawey Y, Musharavati F, Zal NE. Review on medical implantable antenna technology and imminent research challenges. Sensors. 2021;21(9):3163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. European Communications Office. ERC Recommendation of 1997 on Relating to the Use of Short-Range Devices (SRD), Latest Amended on 23 October 2020. https://docdb.cept.org/document/845.

  22. Gupta A, Kansal A, Chawla P. A survey and classification on applications of antenna in health care domain: data transmission, diagnosis and treatment. Sādhanā. 2021;46(2):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Savci HS, Sula A, Wang Z, Dogan NS, Arvas E. MICS transceivers: regulatory standards and applications [medical implant communications service]. In Proceedings. IEEE SoutheastCon. IEEE. 2005;179–82.

  24. Psathas KA, Kiourti A, Nikita KS. A novel conformal antenna for ingestible capsule endoscopy in the medradio band. Prog Electromagn Res. 2013;12:1899.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaur G, Kaur A, Toor GK, Dhaliwal BS, Pattnaik SS. Antennas for biomedical applications. Biomed Eng Lett. 2015;5:203–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar V, Gupta B. On-body measurements of SS-UWB patch antenna for WBAN applications. AEU-Int J Electron Commun. 2016;70(5):668–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koo TW, Hong YJ, Park GK, Shin K, Yook JG. Extremely low-profile antenna for attachable bio-sensors. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2015;63(4):1537–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar A, Badhai RK, Suraj P. Design of a printed symmetrical CPW-fed monopole antenna for on-body medical diagnosis applications. J Comput Electron. 2018;17:1741–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xianming Q, Chen ZN, See TS, Goh CK, Chiam TM. Characterization of RF transmission in human body. In Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI) 2010.

  30. Yuce MR, Dissanayake T. Easy-to-swallow wireless telemetry. IEEE Microwave Mag. 2012;13(6):90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Damaj AW, El Misilmani HM, Abou Chahine S. Implantable antennas for biomedical applications: An overview on alternative antenna design methods and challenges. In 2018 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS). IEEE. 2018;31–7.

  32. Kiourti A, Nikita KS. A review of in-body biotelemetry devices: implantables, ingestibles, and injectables. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(7):1422–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Valanarasi A, Dhanasekaran R. A review on design considerations of implantable antennas. In 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT). IEEE. 2016;207–11.

  34. Konstantinos P, Kiourti A, Nikita KS. Biocompatibility of implantable antennas: Design and performance considerations. In Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). 2014.

  35. Liu C, Guo YX, Xiao S. A review of implantable antennas for wireless biomedical devices. In Forum for electromagnetic research methods and application technologies (FERMAT). 2016;14(3):1–11.

  36. Abadia J, Merli F, Zürcher JF, Mosig JR, Skrivervik AK. 3D-spiral small antenna design and realization for biomedical telemetry in the MICS band. Radioengineering. 2009;18(4):359–67.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kiourti A, Nikita KS. A review of implantable patch antennas for biomedical telemetry: challenges and solutions [wireless corner]. IEEE Antennas Propagat Mag. 2012;54(3):210–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khan AN, Cha YO, Giddens H, Hao Y. Recent advances in organ specific wireless bioelectronic devices: perspective on biotelemetry and power transfer using antenna systems. Engineering. 2022;1(11):27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Soontornpipit P, Furse CM, Chung YC. Design of implantable microstrip antenna for communication with medical implants. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2004;52(8):1944–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Warty R, Tofighi MR, Kawoos U, Rosen A. Characterization of implantable antennas for intracranial pressure monitoring: reflection by and transmission through a scalp phantom. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2008;56(10):2366–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karacolak T, Cooper R, Butler J, Fisher S, Topsakal E. In vivo verification of implantable antennas using rats as model animals. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2010;22(9):334–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Skrivervik AK, Merli F. Design strategies for implantable antennas. In 2011 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference. IEEE. 2011;1–5.

  43. Kiourti A, Nikita KS. Meandered versus spiral novel miniature PIFAs implanted in the human head: tuning and performance. In: Nikita KS, Lin JC, Fotiadis DI, Waldmeyer M-TA, editors. Wireless mobile communication and healthcare. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 80–7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Patil KS, Rufus E. A review on antennas for biomedical implants used for IoT based health care. Sens Rev. 2020;40(2):273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kiourti A, Christopoulou M, Nikita KS. Performance of a novel miniature antenna implanted in the human head for wireless biotelemetry. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI). IEEE. 2011;392–5.

  46. Kiourti A, Nikita KS. Miniature scalp-implantable antennas for telemetry in the MICS and ISM bands: design, safety considerations and link budget analysis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012;60(8):3568–75.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Soontornpipit P, Furse CM, Chung YC. Miniaturized biocompatible microstrip antenna using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2005;53(6):1939–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu WC, Chen SH, Wu CM. Implantable broadband circular stacked PIFA antenna for biotelemetry communication. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2008;22(13):1791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fong LK, Chair R. On the use of shorting pins in the design of microstrip patch antennas. HKIE Trans. 2004;11(4):31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zada M, Yoo H. A miniaturized triple-band implantable antenna system for bio-telemetry applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2018;66(12):7378–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sondaş A, Ucar MH. An implantable microstrip antenna design for MICS-band biomedical applications. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 2016;24(4):2267–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Basir A, Bouazizi A, Zada M, Iqbal A, Ullah S, Naeem U. A dual-band implantable antenna with wide-band characteristics at MICS and ISM bands. Micro Opt Technol Lett. 2018;60(12):2944–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu LJ, Guo YX, Wu W. Miniaturized dual-band antenna for implantable wireless communications. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propagat Lett. 2014;12(13):1160–3.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Guido K, Kiourti A. Wireless wearables and implants: a dosimetry review. Bio Electromagn. 2020;41(1):3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xu LJ, Guo YX, Wu W. Bandwidth enhancement of an implantable antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propagat Lett. 2014;24(14):1510–3.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zada M, Shah IA, Yoo H. Metamaterial-loaded compact high-gain dual-band circularly polarized implantable antenna system for multiple biomedical applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2019;68(2):1140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300GHz. IEEE Standard C95.1. 1999.

  58. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998;74:494–522.

    Google Scholar 

  59. IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. IEEE Standard C95.1. 2005.

  60. “International Telecommunications Union-Radiocommunications (ITU-R), Radio Regulations, SA.1346,” ITU, Geneva, Switzerland; http://itu.int/home.

  61. Zada M, Shah IA, Nasir J, Basir A, Yoo H. Empowering remote patient monitoring with a dual-band implantable rectenna system for wireless power and data transfer. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2023.3319133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tofighi MR. Characterization of biomedical antennas for microwave heating, radiometry, and implant communication applications. In WAMICON 2011 Conference Proceedings. IEEE. 2011; 1–6.

  63. Merli F, Bolomey L, Zurcher JF, Corradini G, Meurville E, Skrivervik AK. Design, realization and measurements of a miniature antenna for implantable wireless communication systems. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2011;59(10):3544–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ito K, Takahashi M, Saito K. Small antennas used in the vicinity of human body. IEICE Trans Commun. 2016;99(1):9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Islam MS, Esselle KP, Bull D, Pilowsky PM. Converting a wireless biotelemetry system to an implantable system through antenna redesign. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2014;62(9):1890–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tseng CF, Chang SY, Chang PJ, Chen WS, Lin JS, Hsu CH. An implanted antenna design for biomedical applications operating in MICS and ISM bands. In 2015 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC). IEEE. 2015;3:1–3.

  67. Basmer T, Todtenberg N, Popiela F, Ortmann S, Birkholz M. Antennas for medical implant applications operating in the MICS band. In 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO). IEEE. 2013;1–3.

  68. Bashir Z, Zahid M, Abbas N, Yousaf M, Shoaib S, Asghar MA, Amin Y. A miniaturized wide band implantable antenna for biomedical application. In 2019 UK/China Emerging Technologies (UCET). IEEE. 2019;1–4.

  69. Amendola S, Moradi E, Koski K, Björninen T, Sydänheimo L, Ukkonen L, Rabaey JM, Rahmat-Samii Y. Design and optimization of mm-size implantable and wearable on-body antennas for biomedical systems. In The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014). IEEE. 2014;520–4.

  70. Skrivervik AK, Bosiljevac M, Sipus Z. Design considerations for implantable and wearable antennas. In 2017 13th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS). IEEE. 2017;83–6.

  71. Gupta B, Sankaralingam S, Dhar S. Development of wearable and implantable antennas in the last decade: A review. In 2010 10th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium. IEEE. 2010;251–67.

  72. Merli F, Bolomey L, Meurville E, Skrivervik AK. Implanted antenna for biomedical applications. In 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. IEEE. 2008;1–4.

  73. Kim J, Rahmat-Samii Y. Implanted antennas inside a human body: simulations, designs, and characterizations. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2004;52(8):1934–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Cseh A. In-vivo biomedical application of antennas. In 2007 16th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit. IEEE. 2007;1–4.

  75. Nikolayev D, Zhadobov M, Karban P, Sauleau R. Conformal antennas for miniature in-body devices: the quest to improve radiation performance. URSI Radio Sci Bull. 2017;2017(363):52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Nikolayev D, Zhadobov M, Joseph W, Martens L, Sauleau R. Radiation performance of highly miniaturized implantable devices. In 2019 49th European Microwave Conference (EuMC). IEEE. 2019;216–9.

  77. Nikolayev D, Joseph W, Zhadobov M, Sauleau R, Martens L. Optimal radiation of body-implanted capsules. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;122(10):108101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Nikolayev D, Zhadobov M, Karban P, Sauleau R. Increasing the radiation efficiency and matching stability of in-body capsule antennas. In 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE. 2016; 1–5.

  79. Nikolayev D, Zhadobov M, Karban P, Sauleau R. Electromagnetic radiation efficiency of body-implanted devices. Phys Rev Appl. 2018;9(2):024033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tang Z, Smith B, Schild JH, Peckham PH. Data transmission from an implantable biotelemeter by load-shift keying using circuit configuration modulator. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42(5):524–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Arena A, Caccamo C, Dario P. An implantable telemetry platform system for in vivo monitoring of physiological parameters. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2004;8(3):271–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Kumar N, Kommuri UK. MIMO antenna mutual coupling reduction for WLAN using spiro meander line UC-EBG. Prog Electromagn Res C. 2018;80:65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kumar N, Kiran KU. Meander-line electromagnetic bandgap structure for UWB MIMO antenna mutual coupling reduction in E-plane. AEU-Int J Electron Commun. 2020;1(127):153423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Medical Implantable RF Transceiver ZL70101 Data Sheet Zarlink Semiconductor, Ottawa, ON, Canada, October 2006.

  85. Campi T, Cruciani S, Maradei F, Montalto A, Musumeci F, Feliziani M. Emi in a cardiac implantable electronic device (cied) by the wireless powering of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2021;63(4):988–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kuang S, Yan G, Wang Z. Optimization design for receiving coil with novel structure based on mutual coupling model in wireless power transmission for capsule endoscope. Energies. 2020;13(23):6460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Mahmood MF, Gharghan SK, Mohammed SL, Al-Naji A, Chahl J. Design of powering wireless medical sensor based on spiral-spider coils. Designs. 2021;5(4):59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Heo MS, Moon HS, Kim HC, Park HW, Lim YH, Paek SH. Fully implantable deep brain stimulation system with wireless power transmission for long-term use in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;57(3):152–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Pichon L. Electromagnetic analysis and simulation aspects of wireless power transfer in the domain of inductive power transmission technology. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2020;34(13):1719–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ali A, MohdYasin MN, Jusoh M, Ahmad Hambali NAM, Abdul Rahim SR. Optimization of wireless power transfer using artificial neural network: a review. Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2019;62(2):651–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Jawad AM, Nordin R, Gharghan SK, Jawad HM, Ismail M. Opportunities and challenges for near-field wireless power transfer: a review. Energies. 2017;10(7):1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Jin K, Zhou W. Wireless laser power transmission: a review of recent progress. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2019;34(4):3842–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Barman SD, Reza AW, Kumar N, Karim ME, Munir AB. Wireless powering by magnetic resonant coupling: recent trends in wireless power transfer system and its applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;51:1525–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Schormans M, Valente V, Demosthenous A. Practical inductive link design for biomedical wireless power transfer: a tutorial. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2018;12(5):1112–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Mahmood AI, Gharghan SK, Eldosoky MA, Soliman AM. Near-field wireless power transfer used in biomedical implants: a comprehensive review. IET Power Electron. 2022;15(16):1936–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Shah IA, Zada M, Yoo H. Design and analysis of a compact-sized multiband spiral-shaped implantable antenna for scalp implantable and leadless pacemaker systems. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2019;67(6):4230–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Feng Y, Li Z, Qi L, Shen W, Li G. A compact and miniaturized implantable antenna for ISM band in wireless cardiac pacemaker system. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Lamkaddem A, El Yousfi A, Abdalmalak KA, Posadas VG, Segovia-Vargas D. Circularly polarized miniaturized implantable antenna for leadless pacemaker devices. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2022;70(8):6423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Alghamdi A, Alshammari A, Chang L, Iqbal A, Mabrouk IB. Miniaturized Implantable Antenna with Ultra-Wide Bandwidth Characteristics for Leadless Pacemakers. In 2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE. 2024;1–5.

  100. Faisal F, Zada M, Yoo H, Mabrouk IB, Chaker M, Djerafi T. An ultra-miniaturized antenna with ultra-wide bandwidth for future cardiac leadless pacemaker. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2022;70(7):5923–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Sharma D, Kanaujia BK, Kaim V, Mittra R, Arya RK, Matekovits L. Design and implementation of compact dual-band conformal antenna for leadless cardiac pacemaker system. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Huang Q, Li H, Jing D, Ding X, Jian J, Xiao S. A miniaturised triple-band MIMO antenna with dual-band circular polarisation for leadless pacemaker. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propagat Lett. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2024.3409079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Sharma D, Kanaujia BK, Kumar S, Rambabu K, Matekovits L. Low-loss MIMO antenna wireless communication system for 5G cardiac pacemakers. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang M, Liu H, Zhang P, Zhang X, Yang H, Zhou G, Li L. Broadband implantable antenna for wireless power transfer in cardiac pacemaker applications. IEEE J Electromagn, RF Micro Med Biol. 2020;5(1):2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Faisal F, Moulay A, Chaker M, Djerafi T. Efficient Wireless Power Transfer to an Ultra-Miniaturized Antenna for Future Cardiac Leadless Pacemaker. In 2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE. 2024;1–4.

  106. Liu H, Shi J, Song L, Liu L, Wang Y, Cheng T, Wang J. Novel multiband antenna design and performance evaluation for wireless electronic capsule systems. IEEE J Electromagn, RF Micro Med Biol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/JERM.2024.3401572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Hayat S, Shah SA, Yoo H. Miniaturized dual-band circularly polarized implantable antenna for capsule endoscopic system. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2020;69(4):1885–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Duan Z, Xu LJ, Gao S, Geyi W. Integrated design of wideband omnidirectional antenna and electronic components for wireless capsule endoscopy systems. IEEE Access. 2018;25(6):29626–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Abbas N, Basir A, Iqbal A, Yousaf M, Akram A, Yoo H. Ultra-miniaturized antenna for deeply implanted biomedical devices. IEEE Access. 2022;20(10):54563–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Alshammari A, Iqbal A, Basir A, Simorangkir RB, Mabrouk IB. Ultra-miniaturized dual-band implantable antenna for wireless capsule endoscopy. IEEE Sens J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3374817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Alemaryeen A. Compact wideband antenna for wireless capsule endoscopy system. Appl Phys A. 2021;127(4):271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Li R, Guo Y. A conformal UWB dual-polarized antenna for wireless capsule endoscope systems. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2021;20(4):483–7.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  113. Nikolayev D, Zhadobov M, Sauleau R. Immune-to-detuning wireless in-body platform for versatile biotelemetry applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2019;13(2):403–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Nikolayev D, Zhadobov M, Le Coq L, Karban P, Sauleau R. Robust ultraminiature capsule antenna for ingestible and implantable applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2017;65(11):6107–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Harlan L, Kaim V, Kumar S, Susila M, Palaniswamy SK, Kanaujia BK. Conformal wideband ingestible capsule MIMO antenna system for multi-channel communication in biotelemetry. AEU-Int J Electron Commun. 2024;1(178):155305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Iqbal A, Al-Hasan M, Mabrouk IB, Nedil M. A compact implantable MIMO antenna for high-data-rate biotelemetry applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2021;70(1):631–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Alazemi AJ, Iqbal A. A compact and wideband MIMO antenna for high-data-rate biomedical ingestible capsules. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Shah SM, Zada M, Nasir J, Owais O, Iqbal A, Yoo H. Miniaturized four-port MIMO implantable antenna for high-data-rate wireless-capsule-endoscopy applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2023;71(4):3123–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Shah SN, Zada M, Nasir J, Shah SM, Arnieri E, Yoo H. Dual-band two-port mimo antenna for biomedical deep tissue communication: design, characterization, and performance analysis. IEEE Access. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3319216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Faisal F, Zada M, Basir A, Chaker M, Djerafi T. Cost-effective 3D printable water-based MIMO and SISO antennas for high-data-rate biomedical implantable devices. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2024.3383291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Tofighi MR, Kawoos U, Neff S, Rosen A. Wireless intracranial pressure monitoring through scalp at microwave frequencies. Electron Lett. 2006;42(3):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Khan MW, Moradi E, Sydänheimo L, Björninen T, Rahmat-Samii Y, Ukkonen L. Miniature coplanar implantable antenna on thin and flexible platform for fully wireless intracranial pressure monitoring system. Int J Antennas Propagat. 2017;2017(1):9161083.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Huang SM, Tofighi MR, Rosen A. Considerations for the design and placement of implantable annular slot antennas for intracranial pressure monitoring devices. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2014;14(14):1514–7.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Psathas KA, Nikita KS. Temperature elevation produced by miniature implantable antennas for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring. In 2014 XXXIth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS). IEEE. 2014;1–4.

  125. Khan MW, Khan A, Rizwan M, Sydänheimo L, Björninen T, Ukkonen L, Rahmat-Samii Y. Loop antenna for deep implant powering in an intracranial pressure monitoring system. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting. IEEE. 2018;207–8.

  126. Faisal F, Zada M, Ejaz A, Amin Y, Ullah S, Yoo H. A miniaturized dual-band implantable antenna system for medical applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2019;68(2):1161–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Shah SA, Yoo H. Scalp-implantable antenna systems for intracranial pressure monitoring. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2018;66(4):2170–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Tamilarasan AK, Krishnadhas SK, Sabapathy S, ThankamonySarasam AS. A novel design of rogers RT/duroid 5880 material based two turn antenna for intracranial pressure monitoring. Microsyst Technol. 2021;27(9):3579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Zhu L, Wang H, Guo YX. A Dual-band Ultra-Miniaturized Scalp-Implantable Antenna for In-Body Bioelectronics. In 2022 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Biomedical Conference (IMBioC). IEEE. 2022;204–6.

  130. Singh MS, Roy S, Ghosh J, Chakraborty U, Ghosh S, Sarkhel A. Design and analysis of compact dual-band antenna system for scalp and skin implantation. Progr Electromagn Res C. 2022;1(125):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Sapari L, Hout S, Chung JY. Brain implantable end-fire antenna with enhanced gain and bandwidth. Sensors. 2022;22(12):4328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Shah SI, Kim W, Yoon IJ. Water-loaded, Compact Ultrawideband Antenna with a Broadside Radiation Characteristic for Brain Signal Monitoring Applications. In 2022 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP). IEEE. 2022;95–6.

  133. Iqbal A, Al-Hasan M, Mabrouk IB, Denidni TA. Self-quadruplexing antenna for scalp-implantable devices. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2024.3356061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Gosalia K, Humayun MS, Lazzi G. Impedance matching and implementation of planar space-filling dipoles as intraocular implanted antennas in a retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2005;53(8):2365–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Soora S, Gosalia K, Humayun MS, Lazzi G. A comparison of two- and three-dimensional dipole antennas for an implantable retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2008;56(3):622–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Raghavan S, Anantha KG. Microstrip patch antenna for a retinal prosthesis and RF MEMS technology. WSEAS Trans Commun. 2009;1(8):853–62.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Permana H, Fang Q, Cosic I. 3-layer implantable microstrip antenna optimised for retinal prosthesis system in MICS band. In International Symposium on Bioelectronics and Bioinformations. IEEE. 2011;65–8.

  138. Permana H, Fang Q, Lee SY. Comparison study on specific absorption rate of three implantable antennas designed for retinal prosthesis systems. IET Micro Antennas Propag. 2013;7(11):886–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Kaka AO, Toycan M, Walker SD. Circularly polarized implantable antenna characterization for retinal prosthesis systems. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 2018;26(3):1180–9.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Liapatis O, Nikita KS. Development of a biocompatible patch antenna for retinal prosthesis: Comparison of biocompatible coatings. In 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE). IEEE. 2020;819–25.

  141. Bahrami S, Moloudian G, Miri-Rostami SR, Björninen T. Compact microstrip antennas with enhanced bandwidth for the implanted and external subsystems of a wireless retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2020;69(5):2969–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Kaim V, Kanaujia BK, Kumar S, Choi HC, Kim KW, Rambabu K. Electrically small circularly polarized UWB intraocular antenna system for retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69(11):3504–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Modak S, Kaim V, Zaidi AM, Kanaujia BK, Rambabu K. Design of electrically small intraocular antenna for retinal prosthesis system and its validation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3424199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Alrawashdeh R, Huang Y, Sajak AA. A flexible loop antenna for biomedical bone implants. In The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014). IEEE. 2014;861–4.

  145. Symeonidis S, Whittow WG, Panagamuwa C, Zecca M. An implanted antenna system for the monitoring of the healing of bone fractures. In 2015 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (LAPC). IEEE. 2015;1–4.

  146. Khokle RP, Esselle KP, Heimlich M, Bokor D. Design of a miniaturized bone implantable antenna for a wireless implant monitoring device.

  147. Riaz M, Tiberi G, Asani H, Ghavami M, Dudley S. A non-invasive bone fracture monitoring analysis using an UHF antenna. In 2020 12th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP). IEEE. 2020;1–5.

  148. Kiriş S, İncesu A, Karaaslan M, Akgöl O, Ünal E. Study of helical antenna as a bone fracture sensor. In 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT). IEEE. 2020;1–4.

  149. Kerketta SR, Ghosh D. Microwave sensing for human bone health evaluation. AEU-Int J Electron Commun. 2020;1(127):153469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Alrawashdeh R. Patch antenna based on spiral split rings for bone implants. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny. 2020;1(7):129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Boologam AV, Krishnan K, Palaniswamy SK, Kumar S, Bhowmik S, Sharma N, Vaish D, Chatterjee S. On the design and development of planar monopole antenna for bone crack/void detection. Int J Antennas Propagat. 2022;2022(1):4663488.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Zeinelabedeen W, Uyguroglu R. Monitoring of surgically treated upper arm fracture by implanted antenna at 402 MHz. Appl Sci. 2023;13(13):7786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Matekovits L, Mir F, Dassano G, Peter I. Deeply implanted conformal antenna for real-time bio-telemetry applications. Sensors. 2024;24(4):1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Singh T, Mishra PK, Verma A, Siddhi S, Sharma P, Tripathi VS. A Trapezoidal Ground-based Truncated Rectangular Patch Antenna for Non-Invasive Monitoring of Bone Fracture Healing. In 2024 IEEE Wireless Antenna and Microwave Symposium (WAMS). IEEE. 2024;1–5.

  155. Wolynski JG, Ilić MM, Notaroš BM, Labus KM, Puttlitz CM, Mcgilvray KC. Vivaldi antennas for contactless sensing of implant deflections and stiffness for orthopaedic applications. Ieee Access. 2021;23(10):1151–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Open access funding provided by Vellore Institute of Technology. The authors thank Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) for funding the open access publication fees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author 1: Study conception and design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation and draft manuscript preparation Author 2: Draft manuscript preparation and critical revision of the article. Both authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niraj Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, we did not use any animal or human tissue. This review is purely based on recent research on an implantable antenna.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohan, A., Kumar, N. Implantable antennas for biomedical applications: a systematic review. BioMed Eng OnLine 23, 87 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01277-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01277-1

Keywords