Table 1 Comparing the performance of CBSS and HWM to estimate spikes based on simulated signals with varying parameters
Simulation parameters | CBSS | HWM | Pairwise difference | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FR (Hz) | ISI CV (%) | SNR (dB) | RoA (%) | RoA (%) | ||
8 | 5 | 30 | 99.3 ± 0.8 | 100.0 ± 0.2 | − 0.7 ± 0.8 | *** |
8 | 5 | 20 | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 99.9 ± 0.3 | − 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.21 |
8 | 5 | 10 | 99.7 ± 0.6 | 99.5 ± 0.7 | 0.2 ± 1.0 | 1.00 |
8 | 20 | 30 | 99.1 ± 0.8 | 99.6 ± 0.7 | − 0.4 ± 1.1 | * |
8 | 20 | 20 | 99.5 ± 0.8 | 99.5 ± 0.7 | 0.0 ± 0.9 | 1.00 |
8 | 20 | 10 | 99.2 ± 0.9 | 98.0 ± 1.3 | 1.3 ± 1.4 | *** |
8 | 40 | 30 | 97.5 ± 1.6 | 97.3 ± 2.0 | 0.3 ± 1.6 | * |
8 | 40 | 20 | 98.0 ± 1.4 | 96.8 ± 1.7 | 1.3 ± 1.8 | *** |
8 | 40 | 10 | 97.2 ± 1.7 | 93.9 ± 2.5 | 3.2 ± 2.3 | *** |
12 | 5 | 30 | 98.8 ± 0.5 | 98.7 ± 1.1 | 0.1 ± 1.3 | 0.38 |
12 | 5 | 20 | 98.8 ± 0.5 | 98.9 ± 1.0 | − 0.1 ± 1.0 | 1.00 |
12 | 5 | 10 | 98.0 ± 1.2 | 98.8 ± 1.0 | − 1.0 ± 1.4 | *** |
12 | 20 | 30 | 98.8 ± 0.6 | 98.5 ± 1.2 | 0.4 ± 1.5 | ** |
12 | 20 | 20 | 98.9 ± 0.7 | 98.4 ± 1.4 | 0.3 ± 1.1 | *** |
12 | 20 | 10 | 97.6 ± 1.7 | 98.6 ± 1.2 | − 0.8 ± 1.5 | * |
12 | 40 | 30 | 97.3 ± 1.5 | 95.2 ± 2.4 | 2.4 ± 2.2 | *** |
12 | 40 | 20 | 97.4 ± 1.6 | 95.3 ± 2.6 | 1.9 ± 2.4 | *** |
12 | 40 | 10 | 95.2 ± 2.6 | 94.9 ± 2.0 | 0.4 ± 2.5 | 1.00 |
16 | 5 | 30 | 98.4 ± 1.1 | 98.4 ± 1.2 | 0.1 ± 1.6 | 1.00 |
16 | 5 | 20 | 98.3 ± 0.8 | 98.4 ± 1.2 | − 0.2 ± 1.4 | 1.00 |
16 | 5 | 10 | 94.8 ± 2.3 | 98.3 ± 1.3 | − 3.8 ± 1.8 | *** |
16 | 20 | 30 | 98.5 ± 1.0 | 96.8 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 2.1 | *** |
16 | 20 | 20 | 98.1 ± 1.5 | 96.7 ± 1.8 | 1.6 ± 1.7 | *** |
16 | 20 | 10 | 93.6 ± 2.3 | 96.4 ± 1.7 | − 3.3 ± 2.4 | *** |
16 | 40 | 30 | 96.0 ± 2.2 | 90.4 ± 2.8 | 5.6 ± 3.6 | *** |
16 | 40 | 20 | 95.6 ± 2.0 | 90.4 ± 2.6 | 5.1 ± 3.5 | *** |
16 | 40 | 10 | 89.6 ± 4.3 | 90.6 ± 3.2 | − 0.6 ± 3.5 | 1.00 |
Mean ± SD (across all parameter combinations) | 97.5 ± 2.7 | 96.9 ± 3.3 | 0.6 ± 2.8 | *** | ||