Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of recent FP classification systems

From: Classification of facial paralysis based on machine learning techniques

References

Objective

Facial movements

Ground truth

Tools

Dataset

Performance

Limitations

Chaoqun Jiang et al. 2020 [10]

FP classification

(6 FP grades)

 

HB

LSCI scanners

K-NN SVM

NN

RGB images blood flow images

80 unilateral FP patients

Accuracy

NN 96.77%

K-NN 67.74%

SVM 86.77%

 

Xin Liu et al. 2020 [7]

FP classification

(3 severity levels)

Rest

Open mouth

Closure the eyes lightly

Elevation of eyebrows Pursing lips

etc.

HB

PHCNN-LSTM

YouTube Facial Palsy Database

Extended CohnKanade Database

Accuracy

PHCNN-LSTM

0.9481%

Few public FP databases available

Lack of various facial expressions in the datasets

Jocelyn Barbosa et al. 2019 [6]

Health classification (normal/patient)

FP classification (PP/CP)

Rest

Raising of eyebrows

Screwing-up of nose

Smiling with showing of teeth

 

RLR

RF

SVM

DT

NB

Hybrid

440 2D images

60 normal subjects

40 PP patients

10 CP patients

Sensitivity

RLR 85.9%

RF 92.3%

SVM 72.5%

DT 90.2%

NB 79.9%

No evaluation of FP degree

No classification of facial paralysis grade

Small dataset

Anping Song et al. 2018 [1]

FP classification

(7 categories)

Rest

Eye closed

Eyebrows raised

Cheeks puffed

Grinning

Nose Wrinkled

Whistling

FNGS2.0

IDFNP

(Inception v3 CNN

 + 

DeepID CNN)

2D images

860 FP patients

Accuracy

97.5%

 

Muhammad Sajid et al. 2018 [5]

FP classification

(5 grades)

 

HB

CNNs

GAN

2D images

2000 Patients

Accuracy

92.60%

 

Banita and Tanwar. 2018 [12]

Evaluation of FP

3 categories for patient (can be cured, cannot be cured, may or may not be cured)

 

HB

Fuzzy logic

3D images

82 patients

  

Ting Wang et al. 2015 [11]

FP classification (6 grades)

Raise eyebrows

Close eyes

Screw up nose

Plump cheeks

Open mouth

HB

FPASMs

SVM (RBF Kernel)

62 FP patients

single-side and both-side

  

Anguraj and Padma 2015 [13]

Classifying the severity of facial paralysis (normal–mild–moderate–severe)

Closing of eye

Raising of eyebrows

Opening of mouth

Screwing of nose

 

SPSA

FFBPN

9 images (2D and grayscale)

Accuracy

94%

Sensitivity

90%

2D grayscale images

Small number of images

  1. CNNs: Convolutional Neural Networks, HB: House–Brackmann, LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging, K-NN: K-nearest neighbor, SVM: Support Vector Machine, NN: Neural Network, PHCNN: Parallel Hierarchy Convolutional Neural Network, LSTM: Long Short-Term Memory, FNGS2.0: Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0, IDFNP: Inception-Deep Facial Nerve Paralysis, GAN: Generative Adversarial Network, FPASMs: Facial Paralysis Active Shape Models, RF: Random Forest, RLR: Regularized Logistic Regression, DT: Decision Tree, NB: Naïve Bayes, SPSA: Salient Point Selection Algorithm, FFBPN: Feed Forward Back Propagation Neural Network