Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlations between 3D foot features and footprint indices

From: Analysis of skeletal characteristics of flat feet using three-dimensional foot scanner and digital footprint

Male

Age

BMI

IH

NH

TAW

TAH

FFH

GFH

ABD

Age

1

−0.18

0.08

0.03

0.16a

0.09

0.05

0.10

0.14

BMI

−0.18a

1

0.21a

0.13

0.1

0.21a

−0.03

−0.01

−0.1

CSI

0.03

0.10

−0.53b

−0.56b

0.14

−0.13

0.04

0.30b

0.18a

SI

0.02

0.09

−0.52b

−0.58b

0.16

−0.2b

0.11

0.27b

0.15

Forefoot

0.15

0.01

0.05

0.02

0.60b

0.18a

0.14

0.19a

0.01

Midfoot

0.08

0.09

−0.51b

−0.54b

0.27b

−0.10

0.07

0.35b

0.17a

Heel

0.19a

−0.05

0.14

0.21a

0.32b

0.2a

−0.1

0.16a

0.07

Female

Age

BMI

IH

NH

TAW

TAH

FFH

GFH

ABD

Age

1

−0.09

−0.15

−0.11

0.23

−0.18

0.03

0.25

0.19

BMI

−0.09

1

0.09

0.01

0.17d

0.46d

0.15c

0.00

−0.07

CSI

0.14c

0.27d

−0.41d

−0.41d

0.15c

−0.06

−0.09

0.12

0.13c

SI

0.21d

0.24d

−0.41d

−0.39d

0.22c

−0.10

−0.02

0.15c

0.08

Forefoot

0.21d

0.00

0.03

0.06

0.56d

0.03

0.18d

0.21d

0.00

Midfoot

0.21d

0.25d

−0.38d

−0.37d

0.29d

−0.05

0.00

0.16d

0.11

Heel

−0.02

0.07

0.17d

0.13c

0.17d

0.21d

0.09

0.02

0.07

  1. Pearson coefficient (ap < 0.05, bp < 0.01). Listed results are for the male/female patricipants
  2. Pearson coefficient (cp < 0.05, dp < 0.01). Listed results are for female participants