Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Fig. 2

From: Functional performance and patient satisfaction comparison between a 3D printed and a standard transradial prosthesis: a case report

Fig. 2

The bimanual task required the participant to grasp and transport a tray to assess synchrony of the upper limbs during a functional reach-to-grasp bimanual task. Use of the standard prosthesis during the task (A), the participant displayed an observable but statistically insignificant (Student’s t-test, p = 0.29) asynchrony while returning his hands to the starting position using the standard prosthesis. This trend of asynchrony was not observed during the use of the 3D printed arm (B)

Back to article page