Table 3 Quantitative results of different segmentation methods
From: Lesion segmentation in breast ultrasound images using the optimized marked watershed method
| \({ACC \,(\%)}\) | \({TPR \,(\%)}\) | \({FPR \,(\%)}\) | \({DSC\, (\%)}\) | \({JI \,(\%)}\) | \({AER\, (\%)}\) | \(\text {HE}\) | \(\text {MAE}\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MW |
94.37 (±0.03) |
97.64 (±0.02) |
79.17 (±0.05) |
71.80 (±0.08) |
56.68 (±0.10) |
81.53 (±0.41) |
69.21 (±26.97) |
27.88 (±8.81) |
| level set |
94.69 (±0.03) |
95.56 (±0.05) |
5.24 (±0.03) |
69.58 (±0.13) |
54.83 (±0.14) |
98.11 (±0.78) |
72.54 (±26.35) |
28.09 (±9.06) |
| MS |
95.76 (±0.04) |
63.05 (±0.13) |
11.93 (±0.16) |
71.57 (±0.10) |
56.72 (±0.12) |
48.88 (±0.17) |
69.91 (±50.21) |
22.68 (±13.67) |
| AMS |
94.38 (±0.05) |
81.70 (±0.15) |
45.32 (±0.28) |
72.69 (±0.09) |
58.01 (±0.11) |
63.62 (±0.32) |
72.72 (±44.87) |
24.94 (±14.53) |
| MS+MW |
95.92 (±0.03) |
67.65 (±0.04) |
15.40 (±0.11) |
73.57 (±0.12) |
59.14 (±0.14) |
47.74 (±0.73) |
67.00 (±25.24) |
21.75 (±7.13) |
| AMSMW |
96.59 (±0.02) |
83.29 (±0.11) |
1.94 (±0.21) |
78.40 (±0.09) |
65.34 (±0.11) |
46.45 (±0.22) |
51.33 (±28.66) |
17.70 (±7.37) |
| level set+MW |
96.25 (±0.03) |
91.58 (±0.06) |
50.52 (±0.20) |
77.47 (±0.09) |
64.18 (±0.12) |
58.94 (±0.45) |
55.85 (±27.01) |
19.50 (±7.36) |
| FSMW |
96.19 (±0.03) |
92.88 (±0.05) |
52.19 (±0.14) |
77.53 (±0.09) |
64.27 (±0.12) |
59.30 (±0.45) |
56.08 (±28.61) |
19.50 (±7.21) |