Skip to main content

Table 4 Participants raw scores on upper extremity outcome measures

From: 3-Dimensional printing in rehabilitation: feasibility of printing an upper extremity gross motor function assessment tool

Participant

CMSA Arm

Range 1–7

CMSA Hand

Range 1–7

FMA Hand

Range 0–14

CAHAI

Range 13–91

3D TRI-HFT (no blocks)

Range 0–70

3D TRI-HFT (with blocks)

Range 0–133

3D TRI-HFT Rod (range: 1–30 on each side)

3D TRI-HFT instrumented cylinder [Nm]

Range 0–50

3D TRI-HFT instrumented credit card [N]

Range

0–50

P31

2

2

2

18

10

11

0

0

15

P32

3

3

3

24

41

47

15

21

25

P33

2

2

0

22

10

11

0

0

1

P34

3

3

4

38

60

66

30

12.5

42.5

P35

2

2

2

25

10

11

0

10

35

P36

2

2

2

26

13

14

10

15

37.5

P39

2

2

2

30

10

11

20

29

50

P40

4

3

2

38

26

30

0

5

13

P42

7

2

2

54

45

51

15

8

35

Mean

3

2.33

2.11

30.56

25

28

10.7

11.6

28.2

Median

2

2

2

26

Range

5

1

4

36

25th percentile

2

2

2

23

50th percentile

2

2

2

26

75th percentile

3.5

3

2.5

38

  1. CMSA-Arm Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment (Impairment Inventory-stage of arm), CMSA-Hand Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment (Impairment Inventory-stage of hand), FMA-Hand Fugl-Meyer Assessment- hand, CAHAI Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, 3D TRI-HFT 3D printed Toronto Rehabilitation institute-Hand Function test
  2. *Scores on all outcome measures are for the affected upper extremity only except for the CAHAI which involves the use of bilateral upper extremity to perform the test