Fig. 6From: Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of two different design metaphyseal-fitting short stems using digital image correlationComparison lines depicted on the DIC prepared surfaces, superimposed by their corresponding FE fields: a lateral surface; b medial surface. Key zones of interest at 2-cm increments along the long axis of the femur within each of the two fields of view; c Trilock BPS stem; d Minima S stemBack to article page