Skip to main content

Table 1 The general characteristics of developed ACDO devices

From: Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications

Year

Refs.

Mechanism

Total size (mm)

Maximum travel (mm)

Generated force (N)

Operated DR (mm/day)

Distraction accuracy (μm)

Distraction step error (μm)

1999

[31]

Motor-driven

–

13.6

–

1

40

0.5

2000

[27]

Hydraulic

–

–

30 to 50

1.5

–

–

2004

[32]

Motor-driven

57

15

70

1

1000

20

2005

[42]

Hydraulic

–

16

20

1

–

–

2008

[21]

Motor-driven

55

10

19

0.9

–

80

2009

[30]

Hydraulic

30 to 100

25

25 to 40

1

10

86

2009

[22]

Hydraulic

–

15

–

0.9

–

21,000

2010

[33]

Motor-driven

60

15

57

1

600

–

2011

[20]

Motor-driven

35

7

2.84

1.4

200

2000

2011

[34]

Motor-driven

–

3

–

3

0.75

30

2013

[13]

Hydraulic

18

12

25 to 40

1.5

–

Average < 500

3

Average < 1000

4.5

–

2014

[1]

Motor-driven

–

18

–

2.4

300

4

2015

[28]

Hydraulic

–

30

25 to 40

3

–

–

2019

[36]

Motor-driven

25

22

38

1

0.0076

0.00006

3

0.00006

5

0.00002