Table 5 Summary of articles that report technical accuracy from augmented reality navigation system
Year-author [References] | Technical accuracy (mm) | Main findings |
|---|---|---|
2016-Kleck et al. [37] | 5.9 ± 3.5 | Description of a novel method for evaluation of pedicle screws in 3 dimensions utilizing O-arm and StealthStation navigation |
2016-Guha et al. [38] | 1.8 ± 3.6 | To characterize the correlation between clinical pedicle screw accuracy, based on postoperative imaging, and absolute quantitative navigation accuracy |
2017-Wu et al. [39] | 1.4–12.3 | Present an advanced AR system for spinal surgery assistance, and develops entry-point guidance prior to vertebroplasty spinal surgery |
2019-Müller et al. [40] | 3.4 ± 1.6 | An intraoperative 3D imaging AR navigation system for pedicle screw fixation was developed |
2019-Urakov et al. [41] | 1–5 | Discusses the potential and limitations of AR in its current state and identifies strategies for successful AR application in future surgery |
This study | 2.5 ± 0.5 | The software method is used to improve the marking method to achieve higher puncture precision. The robot-assisted surgical puncture that may be realized in the future has been verified and good results have been obtained |