Table 3 Comparison between different stiffness of the orbital suspension tissues in the literature and this work

Collins [16]

In primary innervation when the eye rotated nasally from 0° to 45° (human)

4.91

With LR and MR detached

In primary innervation when the eye rotated temporally from 0° to 45° (human)

9.82

With LR and MR detached

Collins et al. [17]

The eye rotated with a nasal innervation of 30° (human)

10.30

With all EOMs attached

The eye rotated with a temporal innervation of 30° (human)

9.22

With all EOMs attached

Scott [22]

The eye had a horizontal eye movement of 40° (human)

4.91

With the LR and MR detached

Barmack [23]

The eye moved horizontally or vertically to 35° (rabbit)

1.08 ± 0.29

With six EOMs attached

This work

The eye rotated temporally from 0° to 31.55° (rabbit)

1.69 ± 0.60

With LR and MR detached

1.53 ± 0.70

With all EOMs detached

The eye rotated nasally from 0° to 31.55° (rabbit)

1.43 ± 0.92

With LR and MR detached

1.17 ± 0.47

With all EOMs detached

The eye rotated upward from 0° to 31.83° (rabbit)

1.17 ± 0.52

With SR and IR detached

1.07 ± 0.37

With all EOMs detached

The eye rotated downward from 0° to 31.83° (rabbit)

1.16 ± 0.60

With SR and IR detached

1.32 ± 0.55

With all EOMs detached