Table 2 The information of the dogs corresponding to the signals in Fig. 4 of the Android smartphone home measurements
From: Cardiac monitoring of dogs via smartphone mechanocardiography: a feasibility study
HM-B # | Breed | Weight | Age | Tot. meas. | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | Wheaten Terrier | 15 | 12 | 4 | Excellent |
#2 | Westie | 10 | 8 | 5 | Moderate |
#3 | Scotish Terrier | 10 | 2 | 4 | Poor |
#4 | Golden Retriever | 35 | 9 | 1 | Moderate |
#5 | Maltese | 7 | 14 | 14 | Moderate |
#6 | Golden Retriever | 32 | 3 | 1 | Moderate |
#7 | Mixed-breed | 17 | 8 | 7 | Excellent |
#8 | Shih-Tzu | 7 | 4 | 4 | Excellent |
#9 | Wheaten Terrier | 20 | 9 | 3 | Excellent |
#10 | Finnish Lapphund | 25 | 3 | 4 | Excellent |
#11 | Havanese | 7 | 6 | 4 | Good |
#12 | Beagle | 17 | 4 | 1 | Good |
#13 | Golden Retriever | 35 | 5 | 1 | Moderate |
#14 | Golden Retriever | 30 | 2 | 1 | Good |
#15 | Shih-Tzu | 7 | 5 | 3 | Moderate |
#16 | Beagle | 15 | 2 | 2 | Poor |