From: Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: a critical review
Author | Participants | Parameters | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Chen et al. [83] | 14 patients referred for LASIK treatment and 22 patients referred for SMILE treatment | bIOP, IOP, Goldman IOP | The bIOP values before and after LASIK and SMILE treatments turned out to be slightly different and did not show any significant correlation with CCT Unlike other pressures—Goldman IOP and IOP, which showed significant changes after the treatments and a significant correlation with CCT |
Hirasawa et al. [75] | 39 patients qualified for cataract surgery | CBI, IOP (Goldman), bIOP and six DCR parameters | Changes in IOP values and biomechanical parameters after cataract surgery were recorded Significant decrease in SP-A1 and significant increase in DA max. after the reference period of 3Â months The bIOP values showed a statistically significant decrease |
Ueki et al. [96] | 8 patients after LASIK (with keratectasia), 11 patients after LASIK (without keratectasia), 24 patients with keratoconus, 34 healthy patients | IOP and 10 DCR parameters | For parameters: HC radius and HCDeflAmp there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between patients with keratectasia after LASIK and patients without keratectasia after LASIK |