Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of our proposed method with other CADs systems

From: Detection of pulmonary ground-glass opacity based on deep learning computer artificial intelligence

CAD systems

Sensitivity (%)

Average false positive

Zhang et al. [15]

82.98

11.76

Ye et al. [16]

90.2

8.20

Choi et al. [17]

95.28

2.27

Setio et al. [18]

90.1

4.00

Ma et al. [19]

88.9

4.00

Liu et al. [20]

89.4

2.00

Our study

95.0

5.62

  1. CAD computer-aided diagnosis