Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of different identification implementations

From: Two-stage CNNs for computerized BI-RADS categorization in breast ultrasound images

 

DSC

AvgDist (pixel)

HDist (pixel)

No ROI-CNN

0.6007 ± 0.0302

51.2115 ± 2688.8

82.7174 ± 3423.1

No-Refined ROI-CNN

0.8665 ± 0.0133

7.6764 ± 157.8465

23.5292 ± 531.9632

Refined ROI-CNN

0.9125 ± 0.0015

3.9668 ± 7.0654

11.0110 ± 40.6948

  1. Experiments “Refined ROI-CNN”, “No-Refined ROI”, and “No ROI-CNN” were compared with three similarity measurements, including DSC, AvgDist, and HDist
  2. The significance for the italic values is to illustrate the method with the best performance according to each evaluated metric
Back to article page

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

ISSN: 1475-925X

Contact us