Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical results of HR and PRV parameters in stationary conditions

From: Video pulse rate variability analysis in stationary and motion conditions

Study

Statistical parameter

Condition/method

Parameter

HR (bpm)

PPmean (ms)

SDNN (ms)

RMSSD (ms)

pNN50 (%)

LF (n.u.)

HF (n.u.)

LF/HF

Poh et al. [17]

r

 

1.00*

0.92*

0.92*

0.88*

RMSE

 

1.24

12.3

12.3

1.1

Sun et al. [18]

r

 

0.998*

0.874*

0.971*

0.978*

0.875*

McDuff et al. [19]

r

(1)

1.00x

0.87x

0.87x

0.86x

(2)

1.00x

0.97x

0.97x

0.95x

Moreno et al. [21]

ρc

(2)

0.9999

0.9108

0.5180

0.5385

0.7934

0.7838

0.3186

Alghoul et al. [22]

r

(1)

0.999*

0.8*

0.84*

0.74*

(2)

0.999x

0.831x

0.789x

0.256x

MAE

(1)

0.006

0.005

0.08

0.34

0.57

0.419

(2)

0.006

0.006

0.1

0.28

0.76

1.69

Bousefsaf et al. [23]

r

(1)

1.00*

Huang and Dung [26]

MAE

(1)

2.01

4.33

Our method

r

 

1.0000*

1.0000*

0.9750*

0.9791*

0.9350*

0.9824*

0.9824*

0.9521*

ICC

 

1.0000*

1.0000*

0.9491*

0.9208*

0.8996*

0.9546*

0.9546*

0.7593*

MAE

 

0.06

0.51

3.49

7.13

8.65

4.78

4.77

0.31

RMSE

 

0.07

0.69

4.26

8.29

10.35

6.20

6.20

0.61

  1. * p < 0.001; xUnspecified p value; – parameter was not reported; ρc: concordance correlation coefficient. The MAE results from [26] are calculated in this work to obtain a mean value of the individual results. Refer to “PRV and statistical analysis” section for parameter definitions. Refer to Table 1 for the conditions/method of the study. (Note: the results reported in [22] appear to make no sense, likely, due to a transcription error. Even so, the results are included in this table)