Table 2 Error analysis for optimization of the two cases
From: Parameters sensitivity assessment and heat source localization using infrared imaging techniques
Parameter | Original value | Optimized value | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Data set (I): A condition with no noise and low intensity of tumor | |||
Depth (d) | 2 cm | 2.03 cm | 1.5 |
Raduse (R) | 5 mm | 4.5 mm | 10 |
Intensity (Q) | 0.37 W | 0.3559 W | 3.81 |
Data set (I): A condition with no noise and higher intensity of tumor | |||
Depth (d) | 1 cm | 1.62 cm | 62 |
Raduse (R) | 5 mm | 4.1 mm | 18 |
Intensity (Q) | 5 W | 5.5276 W | 10.55 |
Data set (II): A condition with 10% noise | |||
Depth (d) | 1 cm | 2.96 cm | 66.2 |
Raduse (R) | 0.09 mm | 0.1 mm | 11.11 |
Intensity (Q) | 0.05 W | 0.0478 W | 4.4 |