Skip to main content

Table 1 Signal-to-error ratio (in dB) between the phantom experiment results from each of the three CFD approaches—pure CFD (labeled “CFD”); CFD driven by one PC-MRI velocity component (labeled “CFD + 1D”); and CFD driven by all three PC-MRI velocity components (labeled “CFD + 3D”), relative to the MRI-measured velocity field

From: Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI

 

CFD

CFD + 1D

CFD + 3D

\({\mathrm {SER}}_{u}\)

2.97

4.16 (\(\uparrow\))

6.74 (\(\uparrow\))

\({\mathrm {SER}}_{v}\)

−0.25

\(-\)0.30 (\(\approx\))

2.03 (\(\uparrow\))

\({\mathrm {SER}}_{w}\)

5.44

16.53 (\(\uparrow \uparrow\))

13.46 (\(\uparrow\))

\({\mathrm {SER}}_{\vec {\nu }}\)

6.57

8.38 (\(\uparrow\))

13.13 (\(\uparrow \uparrow\))

  1. SER values were calculated according to Eqs. (21)–(24)