Skip to main content

Table 1 Optimal classification results and performance comparisons in the three MI paradigms

From: A novel channel selection method for optimal classification in different motor imagery BCI paradigms

Subjects

Dataset 1

Dataset 2

Dataset 3

MI tasks Parad

Two-class control Parad

Four-class control Parad

All Ch

C3, C4, Cz

Opt Ch

All Ch

C3, C4, Cz

Opt Ch

All Ch

C3, C4, Cz

Opt Ch

Acc (%)

Acc (%)

Acc(%)

Acc (%)

Acc (%)

Acc (%)

Acc (%)

Acc (%)

Acc (%)

Sub1

67.8

88.9

92.8

95.6

92.7

99.3

75.5

69.4

87.1

Sub2

62.2

65.6

86.7

82.7

65.1

91.2

74.1

76.4

90.6

Sub3

62.2

61.7

82.8

85.9

51.8

94.1

76.3

72.7

83.3

Sub4

70.0

74.4

90.0

67.9

52.2

85.3

58.2

67.0

80.2

Sub5

71.1

79.4

90.0

93.5

76.2

96.1

63.4

63.4

77.6

Sub6

62.8

54.4

80.0

96.2

95.2

98.6

55.8

73.4

80.3

Sub7

64.4

69.4

80.0

92.2

93.8

98.1

77.7

71.2

81.8

Sub8

57.2

60.6

78.9

82.4

82.3

90.4

74.8

66.9

84.9

Mean

64.7

69.3

85.2

87.1

76.2

94.1

69.5

70.1

83.2

Std

4.6

11.2

5.4

9.5

18.0

4.9

8.8

4.2

4.2

p value

–

–

p = 7.0e−5

–

–

p = 0.024

–

–

p = 2.4e−4

  1. In each dataset, the p-value is computed from one-way ANOVA among Opt Ch Acc, All Ch Acc and C3, C4, Cz Acc. It has to been noted that the subjects 1–8 in all the three datasets are not the same group of subjects
  2. Parad paradigm, Ch channel, Acc accuracy, Opt optimal