Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of estimated ICP from the SR, Kashif method and the PI method for resting state and VM state (mean ± standard deviation, mmHg)

From: Non-invasive detection of intracranial hypertension using a simplified intracranial hemo- and hydro-dynamics model

 

SR method

Kashif method

PI method

Resting state

VM state

Resting state

VM state

Resting state

VM state

Subject 1

10.1 ± 1.1

14.7 ± 0.6*

21.6 ± 4.2

24.5 ± 4.1*

10.1 ± 0.3

9.8 ± 0.5

Subject 2

9.1 ± 1.1

11.8 ± 0.8*

11.3 ± 5.4

13.7 ± 5.0

9.5 ± 0.4

9.5 ± 0.7

Subject 3

14.1 ± 0.8

15.3 ± 0.8*

29.6 ± 4.9

31.2 ± 5.0

9.4 ± 0.4

8.4 ± 0.5

Subject 4

13.5 ± 0.8

14.7 ± 0.8*

23.5 ± 5.1

25.1 ± 5.4

8.2 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.4

Subject 5

10.6 ± 1.2

15.2 ± 1.1*

18.2 ± 5.8

22.7 ± 6.8*

8.3 ± 0.4

9.1 ± 0.5*

Subject 6

9.1 ± 0.9

12.6 ± 1.2*

19.3 ± 7.6

21.1 ± 9.1

9.2 ± 0.6

8.3 ± 0.5

Subject 7

13.5 ± 0.5

16.5 ± 0.5*

24.7 ± 2.8

28.7 ± 3.6*

9.1 ± 0.5

11.3 ± 0.8*

Subject 8

7.8 ± 0.5

9.3 ± 0.7*

9.1 ± 3.0

11.0 ± 3.2*

9.2 ± 0.2

8.5 ± 0.4

Total

10.9 ± 2.4

13.8 ± 2.4

19.7 ± 4.8

22.3 ± 5.3

9.1 ± 0.6

9.1 ± 1.1

  1. * Represents p < 0.05.