Skip to main content

Table 1 Quantitative evaluation of proposed approach in comparison with manual segmentation (gold standard). The average m and deviation σ for three performance measures are calculated for 42 test images and their corresponding gold standards.

From: A coarse-to-fine approach to prostate boundary segmentation in ultrasound images

Number δ E A η
m 3.67 5.62 98.76
σ 1.08 2.98 0.68