Strategies for optimizing the phase correction algorithms in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy

Table 2 The statistics of location (mean) and dispersion (standard deviation and coefficient of variation) for relative phase error [%] obtained for phase correction algorithms with applied tuning - low noise.

Δφ	Automics			Shanon's			Ernst			Dispa			eDispa
	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]	$\bar{x}$	s	CV [%]
5.00	2.01	0.61	30.35	1.89	0.53	28.04	2.03	0.58	28.57	2.38	1.06	44.54	2.15	1.05	48.84
7.50	2.12	0.63	29.79	1.98	0.55	27.85	2.21	0.60	26.92	2.47	0.97	39.27	2.29	1.01	44.10
10.00	2.28	0.58	25.58	2.09	0.57	27.48	2.35	0.56	23.97	2.56	1.01	39.50	2.36	1.03	43.58
12.50	2.38	0.55	22.92	2.20	0.58	26.20	2.42	0.55	22.57	2.65	1.08	40.74	2.46	1.03	41.62
15.00	2.43	0.54	22.14	2.31	0.56	24.35	2.45	0.55	22.57	2.70	1.07	39.70	2.53	1.04	40.98
17.50	2.54	0.52	20.51	2.41	0.57	23.63	2.55	0.55	21.37	2.78	1.08	38.67	2.62	1.03	39.37
20.00	2.64	0.48	18.06	2.53	0.57	22.53	2.60	0.52	20.10	2.85	1.14	39.95	2.69	1.05	39.21
22.50	2.66	0.47	17.70	2.64	0.55	20.64	2.59	0.54	20.66	2.92	1.17	39.97	2.78	1.05	37.66
25.00	2.64	0.51	19.32	2.76	0.51	18.48	2.57	0.58	22.57	2.92	1.05	35.96	2.79	1.08	38.71

ISSN: 1475-925X