Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the accuracy of CFL detection

From: Proposal of a magnetic resonance technique for the evaluation of the calcaneofibular ligament minimizing false positive results

Image

Detection 35°

Detection 38°

Detection 45°

Real

Sim

Real

Sim

Real

Sim

2

1

1

1

0

1

0

14

0

0

1

1

1

1

16

1

1

1

1

0

1

17

1

1

1

1

0

1

19

1

1

1

1

0

1

20

1

1

1

1

0

1

25

0

0

1

0

1

1

26

1

0

1

1

1

0

28

1

1

1

1

0

1

30

1

0

1

1

1

1

31

1

1

0

1

1

1

32

1

1

1

1

1

0

36

1

1

1

1

0

1

41

1

1

1

1

1

0

45

1

1

1

1

0

1

54

1

1

1

1

1

0

64

1

1

1

1

1

0

65

1

1

1

1

1

1

66

1

1

1

1

1

0

67

1

1

1

1

1

1

68

1

1

1

1

1

1

69

1

1

1

1

1

0

78

1

1

1

1

0

1

79

1

1

1

1

1

0

81

1

1

1

1

1

0

83

0

0

0

0

0

0

89

1

1

1

1

1

0

90

1

1

1

1

1

0

96

1

1

1

1

1

0

Accuracy

97%

95%

98%

97%

91%

87%

  1. Detection of the CFL in the reconstructed images, and detection in the simulations was performed at 35°, 38° and 45° angles, with (1) indicating that the ligament was visualized and (0) indicating that the ligament was not visualized.
Back to article page

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

ISSN: 1475-925X

Contact us