Skip to main content

Table 9 Comparison of the proposed method to the reference methods

From: Reducing the airflow waveform distortions from breathing style and body position with improved calibration of respiratory effort belts

Method Average SD Median MAD
Liu et al. 25.9 61.0 16.8 33.6
SM 3.6 74.8 -6.5 51.1
PM(N=8) 3.5 40.5 -3.4 25.9
  1. Minute volume error [%] of the calibration with the method from Liu et al. [24], the standard method and proposed method (with N=8).
Back to article page

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

ISSN: 1475-925X

Contact us