Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the standard method and proposed method in unchanged body positions

From: Reducing the airflow waveform distortions from breathing style and body position with improved calibration of respiratory effort belts

Body position

Compared methods

ΔR2

Δ(relative RMSE)

Sitting

SM→PM(N=8)

18.9 ± 7.7

-43.8 ± 9.1

SM→PM(N=16)

20.6 ± 7.2

-50.0 ± 6.6

PM(N=8)→PM(N=16)

1.4 ± 1.1

-10.4 ± 5.8

Supine

SM→PM(N=8)

19.1 ± 10.5

-45.3 ± 10.7

SM→PM(N=16)

20.3 ± 10.6

-49.6 ± 11.8

PM(N=8)→PM(N=16)

0.9 ± 0.5

-8.4 ± 5.3

  1. The relative improvement of R2 and relative RMSE (average value ± SD, in [%]) between predicted airflows with the standard method and proposed method with N values of 8 and 16. The notation ´a→b´ denotes a performance improvement when changing from method ´a´ to method ´b´.
Back to article page

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

ISSN: 1475-925X

Contact us