Skip to main content

Table 2 Success results

From: Consistent performance measurement of a system to detect masses in mammograms based on blind feature extraction

Success results
  SVM classifier NN classifier
Scanner Learning (%) Test(%) Learning(%) Test(%)
  Train(80%) Val(20%)   Train(80%) Val(20%)  
HOWTEK 960 96.38 93.89 75.29 95.40 89.52 71.22
HOWTEK MultiRAD 850 98.71 91.91 82.71 87.27 80.88 80.56
DBA M2100 99.80 97.46 58.69 99.29 96.90 57.75
LUMISYS 94.17 90.75 71.72 94.68 88.01 76.62
Overall results 92.31 88.22 86.93 90.88 86.14 84.95
  1. The final success rates. The learning set is divided into two: the training subset (Train) and the validation subset (Val), corresponding to 80% and 20% of the prototypes in the learning set, respectively. For each of the four scanners named in the leftmost column, the learning set consisted only of mammograms digitized by that make of scanner.
\