Table 3 A comparison between the proposed system and some recently published techniques and commercial systems
| Â | 3D analysis | Real-time | Cost | Mean error (mm) | RMS error (mm) | Overall precision (mm) | Mandibular morphology estimation | Obstruction | Specialized for mandibular analyzing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed System | yes | yes | moderate | 0.156 | 0.259 | 0.208 | yes | low | yes |
Optical by Pinheiro et al. (2011) [6] | no | no | low | 0.400 | - | 0.300 | no | low | yes |
Optical by Fang and Kuo (2008) [19] | yes | - | moderate | 0.177 | 0.198 | 0.096 | no | high | yes |
Optical-CT by Koseki et al. (2007) [14] | yes | no | high | 0.200 | - | - | yes | low | yes |
Magnetic by Santos et al. (2008) [1] | yes | no | low | - | - | - | - | high | yes |
Magnetic by Yoon et al. (2006) [8] | yes | no | moderate | 0.320 | - | 0.600 | no | moderate | no |
yes | yes | moderate | ~0.1 | - | < 0.1 | no | high | yes | |
Commercial high-end mocap systems | yes | yes | high | < 0.1 | < 0.1 | < 0.1 | yes | low | no |