From: Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System
Model configuration | Advantages | Disadvantages | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | RC model | Reveals the general storage properties of large arteries and the dissipative nature of small peripheral vessels with the simplest model structure | Cannot simulate the effect of high frequency components in the arterial impedance, can not accurately match the aortic pressure and flow-rate waveforms | Venous pressure is assumed to be zero and thus venous pressure fluctuations cannot be described. | Cannot describe the pressure and flow-rate changes in specific segments of the vasculature; cannot simulate the pulse wave transmission effect |
Mono-compartment model | RCR model | Simple, and gives a better description of the high frequency components in the arterial impedance than the RC model | Can not describe the features of the secondary maximum and a discrete minimum in the medium frequency range of the arterial impedance. | Â | Â |
 | RLCR model | Simple, and offers improved description of the secondary maximum and a discrete minimum in the medium frequency range of the arterial impedance than the RCR model | Parameter setting is more difficult than for the RCR and RC models, which limited its applications. |  |  |
 | RLCRCLR model | Simplest model that accounts for venous pressure fluctuations | The model structure is complex compared with RC, RCR and RLCR models, thus parameter setting is more difficult. |  | |
Multiple compartment model | Flexible combination of RLC network elements to describe the vessel characteristics to whatever level of detail required. Captures, within the limitations of the model, pulse wave transmission effects. | More complex to implement than the mono-compartment models. Difficult to determine appropriate RLC parameters when the model includes many vessel segments. |