Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of QRS Detection Performance with Published Methods (First ECG Channel of MITDB)

From: A wavelet-based ECG delineation algorithm for 32-bit integer online processing

QRS Detector

# annotations

FP

FN

Se[%]

P+ [%]

This work

109010

148

252

99.77

99.86

Martinez et al. [13]

109428

153

220

99.80

99.86

Ghaffari et al. [18]

109428

129

101

99.91

99.88

Aristotle [25]

109428

94

1861

98.30

99.91

Li et al. [19]

104182 (*)

65

112

99.89

99.94

Afonso et al. [26]

90909

406

374

99.59

99.56

Bahoura et al. [20]

109809 (*)

135

184

99.83

99.88

Lee et al. [27]

109481

137

335

99.69

99.88

Hamilton and Tompkins [28]

109267

248

340

99.69

99.77

Pan and Tompkins [23]

109809 (*)

507

277

99.75

99.54

Poli et al. [29]

109963

545

441

99.60

99.50

Moraes et al. [30]

N/R

N/R

N/R

99.22

99.73

Hamilton [31]

N/R

N/R

N/R

99.80

99.80

  1. Inspired by [13], Table 2
  2. (*) a discrepancy was found in the original publication between reported total and record-by-record count
  3. N/R: not reported