Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of QRS Detection Performance with Published Methods (First ECG Channel of MITDB)

From: A wavelet-based ECG delineation algorithm for 32-bit integer online processing

QRS Detector # annotations FP FN Se[%] P+ [%]
This work 109010 148 252 99.77 99.86
Martinez et al. [13] 109428 153 220 99.80 99.86
Ghaffari et al. [18] 109428 129 101 99.91 99.88
Aristotle [25] 109428 94 1861 98.30 99.91
Li et al. [19] 104182 (*) 65 112 99.89 99.94
Afonso et al. [26] 90909 406 374 99.59 99.56
Bahoura et al. [20] 109809 (*) 135 184 99.83 99.88
Lee et al. [27] 109481 137 335 99.69 99.88
Hamilton and Tompkins [28] 109267 248 340 99.69 99.77
Pan and Tompkins [23] 109809 (*) 507 277 99.75 99.54
Poli et al. [29] 109963 545 441 99.60 99.50
Moraes et al. [30] N/R N/R N/R 99.22 99.73
Hamilton [31] N/R N/R N/R 99.80 99.80
  1. Inspired by [13], Table 2
  2. (*) a discrepancy was found in the original publication between reported total and record-by-record count
  3. N/R: not reported